Smad7 inhibitors for the treatment of cns diseases

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to the use of a specific inhibitor of Smad7 expression or function for the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition for the prevention, amelioration or treatment of a disease of the central nervous system and/or diseases related and/or caused by said disease of the central nervous system. Furthermore, methods for preventing, ameliorating and/or treating such diseases are disclosed.

The present invention relates to the use of a specific inhibitor of Smad7 expression or function for the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition for the prevention, amelioration or treatment of a disease of the central nervous system and/or diseases related and/or caused by said disease of the central nervous system. Furthermore, methods for preventing, ameliorating and/or treating such diseases are disclosed.

Several documents are cited throughout the text of this specification. The disclosure content of each of the documents cited herein (including any manufacturer's specifications, instructions, etc.) are hereby incorporated by reference.

The current model for the initiation of T cell-mediated inflammatory disease of the CNS includes peripheral antigen-specific T cell activation and Th1 differentiation (Martin, 1992; Miller, 1994; Zamvil, 1990). A peripheral T cell activation step appears to be required for autoreactive T cells to enter the CNS via the blood-brain barrier (Wekerle, 1986). The process of lesion formation is further governed by a complex pattern of cyto- and chemokine expression upon restimulation of autoreactive T cells in situ (Hoffman, 1998; Karpus, 1999). It is widely accepted that Th1 cells, critical for cell-mediated immunity by their production of IL-2, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha and lymphotoxin are involved in the immunopathology of organ-specific autoimmune disease (Liblau, 1995; Raine, 1995 Steinman, 1997). A role as regulators has been suggested for Th2 cells (Mathisen, 1997; Nicholson, 1995; Racke, 1994) and cells producing Transforming-growth-factor-beta (TGF-beta) (Chen, 1996; 1994; O'Garra, 1997; Weiner, 1994).

TGF-beta belongs to a family of peptides with pleiotropic effects widely distributed throughout the body (Sporn, 1989) and in particular in the immune system (Letterio, 1998). In addition to the TGF-betas, bone morphogenetic proteinis (BMP) and activin make up the BMP-superfamily (Miyazono, 2001).

The three isotypic TGF-betas are extremely well conserved across species with a greater than 99% identity between the mature TGF-betal sequences of various mammalian species (Derynck, 1986; 1987). TGF-betas have important roles in cell growth and differentiation, organ development, matrix formation, wound repair and immune function (Blobe, 2000; Chen, 2001; Letterio, 2000).

TGF-beta regulates cellular processes by binding to three high-affinity cell-surface receptors known as types I, II and III. The type III receptors are the most abundant receptor type. They bind TFG-beta and transfer it to its signaling receptors, the type I (RI) and II (RII) receptors. Upon binding of a ligand to a type II receptor, type II receptor kinases phoshorylate serine and threonine residues within the intracellular GS (glycine-serine-rich) domain of type I receptors, leading to activation of the type I receptor. The activated TGF-betaRI then interacts with an adaptor molecule SARA (Smad anchor for receptor activation) (Tsukazaki, 1998), which facilitates the access of particular members of the Smad family of proteins, called receptor-regulated Smads (R-Smads) to activated TGF-beta receptors. The activated type I receptor kinases then phosphorylate R-Smads differentially at two serine residues at their extreme C termini (summarized in Itoh, 2000). R-Smads include Smad1, -2, -5 and -8 proteins. Smad2 and -3 mediate the signaling of TGF-beta and activins; and Smad8 mediates the signaling of ALK-2 receptor kinases (Baker, 1996; Lagna, 1996; Liu, 1996; Zhang, 1996, 1997).

Inhibitory Smads (I-Smads) consist of vertebrate Smad6 and Smad7 and Drosophila daughters against dpp (Dad). Unlike R-Smads, which augment the signaling of TGF-beta molecules, I-Smads inhibit TGF-beta superfamily signaling. Whereas Smad6 appears to inhibit BMP signaling preferentially, Smad7 acts as a general inhibitor of TGF-beta family signaling (Itoh, 1998; Souchelnytskyi, 1998; Ishisaki, 1999). I-Smads can bind stably to the intracellular domain of activated type I receptors, thereby inhibiting further signal transduction by preventing the phosphorylation of R-Smads by the receptor (Imamura, 1997; Inoue, 1998; Souchelnytskyi, 1998).

The expression of I-Smads appears to be part of a negative feedback loop. The expression of Smad6 and -7 can be induced rapidly and in some cases directly by BMP, activin and/or TGF-beta in cultured cells. In addition, Smad3 and -4 can directly bind to the Smad7 promoter to mediate activation of this promoter by activin or TGF-beta. (Nagarajan, 1999; von Gersdorff, 2000). In addition to stimulation through the TGF-beta-Smad pathway, Smad7 expression can also be induced by IFN-gamma through the Jak/Stat pathway (Ulloa, 1999), by TNF-alpha through activation of NF-kappaB (Bitzer, 2000), and by norepinephrine also through NF-kappaB (Kanamaru, 2001).

In addition to the function of Smad7 as an inhibitor of the phosphorylation of R-Smads by type I receptors at the cytoplasm/cell membrane border, Smad7 was also found to occur abundantly in the nuclei of certain cells and to be exported from the nucleus upon TGF-beta stimulation or a change in cell substrate (Itoh, 1998; Zhu, 1999). Pulaski (2001) showed that mutation in a major phosphorylation site of Smad7 at Ser-249 did not affect the inhibitory effect of Smad7 on TGF-beta or BMP7 signalling and did not interfere with nuclear localization of Smad7. Instead, phosphorylation of Smad7 at Ser-249 was shown to be important for its ligand-independent ability to regulate transcription.

Mice overexpressing Smad7 exhibit defective T cell responses to TGF-beta1, show markedly greater cytokine production in vitro, and show enhanced antigen-induced airway inflammation (Nakao, 2000). Smad7 has been shown to be overexpressed in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) mucosa and purified mucosal T cells. In an in vitro system specific antisense oligonucleotides for Smad7 reduced Smad7 protein expression in cells isolated from IBD patients, permitting the cells to respond to exogenous TGF-beta (Monteleone, 2001).

WO 97/30065 identifies a cDNA (fchd540) encoding for Smad7 and discusses the upregulation of Smad7 in cardiovascular disease states. Diseases targeted by methods described in WO 97/30065 relate to cardiovascular disorders, in particular artherosclerosis, ischemia/reperfusion, hypertension, restenosis and arterial inflammation, as well as fibroproliferative oncogenic disorders, including diabetic retinopathy, cancer, tumorigenesis, vascularization of tumors, angiogenesis, artherosclerosis, inflammation and fibrosis.

WO 98/53068 also describes nucleic acid molecules encoding Smad7 and provides methods for decreasing or increasing TGFbeta superfamily signal transduction in mammalian cells based on targeting smad7 genes, gene products or interacting partners. Furthermore, methods for treating a subject suffering from lung cancer characterized by elevated expression of a Smad6 gene or a Smad7 gene are described. These methods involve administering to the subject an amount of an antisense nucleic acid which binds to the expression product of the Smad 6 or Smad7 gene effective to reduce the expression of the gene.

In addition, medical methods for reducing eye defects in a developing mammalian embryo are disclosed. These methods include contacting the cells of the embryo with an agent which reduces the expression or activity of a Smad7 nucleic acid molecule or an expression product thereof.

WO 01/53313 describes antisense compounds, compositions and methods are provided for modulating the expression of Smad7. The invention describes a method of treating a human having a disease or condition associated with Smad7 comprising administering to said animal a therapeutically or prophylactically effective amount of the antisense compound so that expression of Smad7 is inhibited. In the following “sub-claims” said disease or condition is a developmental disorder, a cardiovascular disorder, a hyperproliferative disorder or a wound healing disorder.

WO 01/21794 describes Smad associating polypeptides identified by yeast two hybrid screening. It is said that this invention further provides methods for reducing or increasing TGF-beta family signal transduction in a cell. It is mentioned that, in vivo, such methods are useful for modulating growth, e.g., to treat cancer and fibrosis. In addition it is stated that such methods are also useful in the treatment of conditions which result from excessive or deficient TGF-signal transduction. In WO 00177168 antagonists of BMP and TGF-β signaling pathways are disclosed whereby these antagonists relate to Smurf1 and Smurf2, capable of interacting with Smad1, 5 and 7. Smurf1 and Smurf2 are HECT type E3 ubiquitin ligases, containing the N-terminal C2 domain, followed by WW domains and the C-terminal HECT domain. The HECT domain is responsible for the E3 ligase activities of Smurfs. Interaction of Smurfs with I-Smads leads to nuclear export of the latter. In the cytoplasm, the C2 domain might target I-Smads to the cell membrane, and facilitate the interaction of I-Smads with TGFbeta receptors. Smurfs do not only recognize I-Smads as substrates, but also capture TGFbeta receptors as their targets, thereby leading to the degradation of both I-Smads and the receptor complexes (Ebisawa, 2001, Kavsak, 2000, Suzuki, 2002).

WO 00/77168 describes a protein Smurf2 which induces degradation of TGF-beta-receptors and Smad7. According to said application Smurf2 directly interacts with Smad7 via a PPXY motif in Smad7. Smurf2 is involved with TGF-beta receptor degradation acting in partnership with Smad7 as an antagonist or negative regulator of TGF-beta signalling. Activation of TGF-beta signalling results in Smad7-dependent recruitment of Smurf2 to the TGF-beta receptor complex. In the absence of activated TGF-beta receptor complex, Smurf2 does not alter the steady state level and turnover of Smad7. Recruitment of Smurf2 to the TGF-beta receptor by Smad7 promotes the degradation of the Smad7-TGF-beta receptor complex by both proteasomal and lysosomal pathways. It is stated that overexpression of Smurfs by gene therapy may be used to correct clinical conditions that result from excessive Smad signaling.

Other proteins found to interfere with Smad7 comprise YAP65 and TIEG. Yes-Associated Protein (YAP65) is a proline rich phosphoprotein originally identified as a protein binding to the SH3 domain of the Yes proto-oncogene product (Sudol, 1994). Ferrigno et al. identified YAP65 as novel Smad7-interacting protein through yeast two hybrid screening (Ferrigno, 2002). They showed in COS-7 cells that YAP65 potentiates the inhibitory activity of Smad7 against TGFbeta-induced, Smad3/4 dependent, gene transactivation. Furthermore, YAP65 was shown to augment the association of Smad7 to activated TGFbeta receptor type 1 molecules. TGFbeta inducible early gene (TIEG) is a zinc finger Krüppel-like transcription factor (KLF) and is induced by TGFbeta in many cell types (Subramaniam, 1995, Subramaniam, 1998). Overexpression of TIEG mimics effects of TGFbeta in many cell types (Chalaux, 1999, Hefferan, 2000, Ribeiro, 1999, Tachibana, 1997). TIEG has been shown to modulate the TGFbeta/Smad signaling pathway by binding to the Smad7 promoter and thereby repressing the Smad7 transcription. In addition TIEG increases transcription of the Smad2 gene. An E3 ubiquitin ligase, Seven in Absentia homologue-1 (SIAH1), acts as a TIEG1 interacting protein and induces degradation of TIEG1, thereby limiting the duration and/or magnitude of TGFbeta responses (Johnsen, 2002a, Johnsen, 2002b, Johnsen, 2002c).

Other TGF-β pathway genes are described in WO 98145467 and WO 01/16604 describes a method for screening for agents which are capable of modulating TGF-β cell signalling.

Relevant to autoimmune disease in the central nervous system (CNS) such as multiple sclerosis (MS) the immunosuppressive effects of TGF-beta were extensively investigated in vitro using myelin-specific autoimmune T cells, and in vivo, taking advantage of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), which is the prime model for the human disease MS.

EAE can be induced in susceptible animal strains (e.g. rodents and primates) either by immunization (=active EAE) with a myelin antigen in complete or incomplete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) or by adoptive systemic transfer of autoreactive T cells obtained from animals previously immunized and activated in vitro with the respective autoantigen (at-EAE) (Brocke, 1996; Zamvil, 1990).

The endogenous TGF-beta production was shown by most authors to be upregulated in the CNS and presumably play a downmodulatory role during the recovery phase of acute EAE (Khoury, 1992; Racke, 1992; Issazadeh, 1995; Issazadeh, 1998). No upregulation of TGF-beta was found by Okuda (1995). In later work, however, a reduction of TGF-beta expression in the preclinical and acute phase in lymph node cells of mice immunized with myelin antigen in CFA (Complete Freunds Adjuvant) as compared to control mice treated with CFA alone was found (Okuda, 1998). Immunizing DA-rats (dark agouti rats) with rat spinal cord in incomplete Freund's adjuvant causes a prolonged chronic and relapsing course of EAE featuring extensive demyelination. While TGF-beta expression was described to be upregulated in the CNS of Lewis rats during the remission phase of (monophasic) EAE, a significant expression of regulatory cytokines such as TGF-beta (and IL-4 and IL-10) was not found in the DA rat CNS or lymphoid tissues at various time points (Issazadeh, 1996). Cytokine analysis demonstrated that the mRNA expression of IL-10 and TGF-beta1 was generally low in both acute EAE and the first attack of chronic EAE and upregulated at later stages of chronic EAE. It was suggested that anti-inflammatory cytokines play only a minor role in the relapse (Tanuma, 2000).

Recovery of disease in mice transgenic for an MBP-specific T cell receptor induced to develop EAE was associated with an immune deviation of Th1 T cells towards cells that secreted IL4, IL-10, and TGF-beta both in the periphery and in the CNS [Chen, 1998]. Kiefer and colleagues carried out a systematic study of TGF-beta expression (Kiefer, 1998). In actively induced monophasic EAE in the Lewis-rat, in situ hybridization revealed strong expression of TGF-beta1 in meningeal and perivascular mononuclear infiltrates at onset of the disease, continued expression in perivascular infiltrates and scattered mononuclear cells at maximal disease severity, and expression in scattered parenchymal cells during recovery. Cellular expression of TGF-beta1 by T-cells, macrophages, and microglia summed up to a long-lasting elevation of TGF-beta1 mRNA extending well into the recovery phase. While TGF-beta1 expressed early in the disease by T-cells was thought to contribute to inflammatory lesion development, its expression by microglial cells was suggested to potentially contribute to recovery (Kiefer, 1998).

Recombinant human TGF-beta1 administered at 2 μg daily. i.p. for two weeks after the last of several immunizations of SJL-mice with spinal cord homogenate in CFA delayed but did not prevent or significantly ameliorate the severity of the first disease episode in this EAE-model. Treatment after the first attack during a repeat immunization protocol reduced the severity of booster-immunization induced second episodes. Injections of TGF-beta1 initiated after the onset of an acute episode of EAE did not noticeably influence the course of that episode (Kuruvilla, 1991). However, in the same model spontaneous relapses were very efficiently blocked by daily treatment initiated 35 days after the onset of the first attack and maintained for 4 weeks (Kuruvilla, 1991). Using TGF-beta1 purified from human platelets it was subsequently shown that 1 pg of TGF-beta1 administered i.v. on days 1-5 after transfer of encephalitogenic lymph node cells in SJL-mice partially prevented EAE and significantly ameliorated disease scores mainly during the first and second disease attacks (Racke, 1991). Histology of TGF-beta1-treated mice sacrificed at day 7 post transfer revealed markedly reduced inflammation and absence of demyelination as opposed to mice treated with placebo. When TGF-beta1 treatment was initiated at the earliest signs of clinical disease and continued for 5 days the severity of subsequent relapses was reduced (Racke, 1991; Johns 1991). Treatment with recombinant simian TGF-beta 2 resulted in similar inhibition of T cell activation and proliferation in vitro.

Recent studies showed that adoptive transfer of activated MBP-specific Th1 clones transduced to secrete latent TGF-beta1 delayed and ameliorated EAE-signs in mice immunized with PLP (Chen, 1998). This strategy allowed for site-specific local delivery of therapeutic active TGF-beta1 to the CNS inflammatory infiltrates, was antigen-specific, yet apparently allowed bystander immunosuppression by T cells activated in situ (Chen, 1998; Thorbecke, 2000).

EAE was also successfully inhibited by a single injection of a cytokine (IL-4, IFN-beta, or TGF-beta) DNA-cationic liposome complex directly into the central nervous system (Croxford, 1998). In another study a prolonged continous TGF-beta delivery was reached by injection of a naked plasmid DNA expression vector encoding TGF-beta1 intramuscularly. This resulted in production of TGF-beta1 and protection from clinical and histopathological signs of MBP-induced EAE (Piccirillo and Prud'homme, 1999). Low doses of TGF-beta1 administered nasally inhibited development and relapses of chronic-relapsing EAE in DA rats.

Anti-TGF-beta1 antibody treatment in vivo aggravated EAE-severity (Miller, 1992; Racke, 1992; Santambrogio, 1993; Johns, 1993; Santambrogio, 1998).

TGF-beta 1 and 2 mRNA-expression in CNS tissue from MS cases, demonstrated by in situ hybridization, was found mainly in perivascular rather than parenchymal cells, suggesting circulating inflammatory cells as the major source (Woodroofe, 1993). In summary, they found both a stronger expression and a differently localized cellular distribution in MS (active demyelinating and chronic active and inactive lesions) as opposed to control tissue.

In a bioassay from peripheral blood cultures, TGF-beta like activity was found to be increased in patients with active disease as opposed to those with inactive disease and healthy donors and was found in particular in the subgroup tested during the regression of symptoms (Beck, 1991). Decreased TGF-beta production by lymphocytes of patients with MS correlated directly with disease activity. MS patients with active disease produced less TGF-beta than MS patients with stable disease. The cells producing TGF-beta were primarily CD8+ T cells and CD45RA+T cells (Mokhtarian, 1994).

Using a semiquantitative PCR the expression of TGF-beta and IL-10 was reported to decrease prior to a relapse while the expression of TNF-alpha and lymphotoxin increased (Rieckmann, 1995).

In an open-label phase 1 trial of 11 patients with secondary progressive (SP) MS the safety of recombinant active TGF-beta2 was assessed (Calabresi, 1998).

There is increasing evidence that the powerful anti-inflammatory properties of TGF-beta as a negative regulator of T-cell immune response play a key role in the pathophysiology of cerebral ischemia and other CNS pathologies (Benveniste, 1998, Kulkarni, 1993). Increased expression of TGF-beta was demonstrated in post mortem brain tissue of human stroke victims (Krupinski, 1996), and in brain biopsies from patients suffering from various acute or chronic neurodegenerative disorders including stroke, Parkinson's disease, or Alzheimer disease (Mattson, 1997, Pratt, 1997). Therefore, this cytokine is regarded as an injury-related peptide and a potential target for therapeutic intervention (Kriegistein, 1998).

In vitro data support a neuroprotective role of the TGF-beta pathway with particular reference to NMDA-induced neuronal death in excitotoxic paradigms such as hypoxia-ischemia (Buisson, 1998, Choi, 1996, Prehn, 1993). On the contrary, findings from in vivo-studies consistently describe induction of TGF-beta1 mRNA expression within hours after focal brain ischemia and upregulation persisting for several weeks after the insult (Lehrmann, 1998, Ruocco, 1999, Wang, 1995). More detailed data by Ali and coworkers(Ali, 2001) localized the significantly enhanced expression of TGF-beta1 to the ischemic penumbra, i.e. to the transitional metabolic zone between the ischemic core and the periinfarct zone. As blocking of the biological activity of TGF-beta by a specific antagonist increased both excitotoxic and ischemic lesions, data derived from rodent stroke models suggest that activation of the TGF-beta signaling pathway may be associated with neuroprotection (Ali, 2001, Ruocco, 1999).

In vivo data from a stroke model in rat identifying the cellular source of TGF-beta1 production after focal cerebral ischemia, demonstrated early induction as well as long-term upregulation of TGF-beta1 mRNA expression confined to activated microglia and macrophages. Therefore, TGF-beta1 mediated functions represent an immediate and persistent response in the acute ischemic brain lesion and are involved in the phase of tissue remodeling after stroke (Lehrmann, 1998). More detailed, a biphasic expression of TGF-beta1 with a first peak at 12 hours and at 7 days after permanent MCA occlusion in the infarcted tissue has been reported, the latter most probably linked to the downregulation of inflammatory tissue response, the induction of neoangiogenesis, and glial scar formation (Logan, 1994, Yamashita, 1999). The upregulation of TGF-beta1 gene expression extends from 3 hours to 4 days after transient forebrain ischemia (Zhu, 2000), up to 15 days after permanent MCA occlusion (Wang, 1995), and from 6 hours to 21 days after global brain ischemia (Lehrmann, 1995), respectively.

Data from in vivo studies concerning the intraarterial or the intracerebroventricular application of TGF-beta1 showed both treatment before (Gross, 1993) and after induction of pathology (Gross, 1994, McNeill, 1994) to be associated with a significant reduction of neuronal loss and infarct size in a rabbit model of thromboembolic stroke or a rat model of severe hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, respectively. In transient global ischemia in rats, Henrich-Noack and colleagues were able to show significant protection of pyramidal CA1 cells by intrahippocampal injection of TGF-beta1 prior to ischemia (Henrich-Noack, 1996). In mice overexpressing TGF-beta1 after adenoviral gene transfer Pang and coworkers (2001) demonstrated a reduction of infarct volume, associated with an inhibition of the inflammatory response to MCA occlusion in terms of reduced leukocyte and monocyte/macrophage infiltration into the ischemic brain tissue (Pang, 2001).

Highly elevated levels of TGF-beta1 mRNA were also reported for the ischemic penumbra in brain samples of human stroke victims (Krupinski, 1996). Furthermore, the enhanced expression of several TGF-beta isoforms and of the type I receptor protein in reactive processes surrounding ischemic brain lesions was demonstrated in human autopsy and biopsy material (Ata, 1997). While TGF-beta1 serum levels were not significantly different in stroke patients and healthy volunteers, a close correlation between TGF-beta1 levels and both clinical and neuroradiological parameters of brain injury have been reported (Kim, 1996, Slevin, 2000, Stanzani, 2001).

Experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in a rapid and significant necrosis of cortical tissue at the site of injury. In the following hours and days, secondary injury exacerbates the primary damage resulting in significant tissue destruction and neurological dysfunction (Faden, 1993). Alterations in excitatory amino acids, increased oxidative stress and increased apoptosis contribute to progressive neuronal death following TBI. (summarized in (Sullivan, 2002) and ref. therein). Rimaniol et al. described a biphasic production of TGFbeta following cerebral trauma, with a first peak after 30 min. and a second peak 48 h after the lesion (Rimaniol, 1995). Lindholm et al. showed increased production of TGFbeta1 mRNA in the rat cerebral cortex after a penetrating brain injury (Lindholm, 1992). In this paper they argued that TGFbeta1 expressed in the lesioned brain may play a role in nerve regeneration by stimulating nerve growth factor (NGF) production and by controlling the extent of astrocyte proliferation and scar formation Logan et al. showed a diffuse increase of TGFbeta1 mRNA and protein around the cerebral stab wound at 1, 2 and 3 days; at 7 and 14 d after lesion the distribution was more localized to the region of the glial scar (Logan, 1992). They suggested to use TGFbeta1 antagonists to limit the pathogenesis associated with matrix deposition in the CNS wound. Kriegelstein et al. showed that the survival promoting effect of Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) in vivo and in vitro requires the presence of TGFbeta (Krieglstein, 1998). In a very recent study, Peterziel et al. demonstrated that the TGFbeta induced GDNF responsiveness in neurons is caused by the TGFbeta induced recruitment of the gycosyl-phosphatidyl-inositol-anchored GDNF receptor (GFR)alpha1 to the plasma membrane (Peterziel, 2002).

TGF-beta is present in senile amyloid plaques found in the CNS and is overexpressed in Alzheimer's disease brain compared with controls (Finch, J. Cell Biochem 53 (1993), 314-322). TGF-beta has been implicated in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis (Wyss-Coray, Nature 389 (1997), 603-606; Flanders, Neurology 45(8) (1995), 1561-1569; van der Wal, Neuroreport 4 (1993), 69-72) for the following reasons: It accelerates amyloid deposition in an animal model of Alzheimer's disease; i.e. transgenic mice coexpressing human TGF-beta1 and mutated amyloid precursor protein (APP) (Finch, (1993) loc. cit.; Wyss-Coray, (1997), loc. cit.; Wyss-Coray, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 903 (2000), 317-323). TGF-beta drives astrocytic overexpression of mRNA encoding for the APP. On a molecular level, TGF-beta activation of Smad protein complexes promotes transcription of the APP gene (Burton, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 295 (2002), 702-712; Burton, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 295 (2002); 713-723). However, it has been shown in contrast by Wyss-Coray and coworkers (2001) that a modest increase in astroglial TGF-beta1 production in aged transgenic mice expressing the human beta-APP significantly reduces the number of parenchymal amyloid plaques and the overall cortical amyloid-beta load and decreases the number of dystrophic neuritis (Wyss-Coray, Nat. Med. 7(5) (2001), 612-618). In human APP/TGF-beta1-expressing mice, amyloid beta accumulated substantially in cerebral blood vessels, but not in parenchymal plaques (Wyss-Coray, (2001) loc. cit.). In human Alzheimer cases, plaque-associated amyloid beta immunoreactivity was inversely correlated with vascular amyloid beta and cortical TGF-beta1 mRNA levels. The reduction of parenchymal plaques in human APP/TGF-beta1 mice was associated with a strong activation of microglia and an increase in inflammatory mediators. Recombinant TGF-beta1 stimulated amyloid-beta clearance in microglial cell cultures (Wyss-Coray, (2001), loc. cit.).

However, research on TGF-beta uncovered ambiguous or detrimental effects of TGF-beta, last but not least from the perspective of autoimmune therapy; TGF-beta is considered in the art as a “two-edged sword”. Kiefer (1998), analyzing TGF-beta expression in monophasic EAE of the Lewis rat, found evidence for early expression in T cells, possibly contributing to inflammatory lesion development while the later occurring expression within microglia was suggested to play a downmodulatory role. When Ag-specific murine T cell lines and clones were cultured in the presence of TGF-beta the effector function of these autoreactive cells and demyelinating lesion formation upon adoptive transfer in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis were markedly enhanced (Weinberg 1992). In another EAE model it was shown that the effects of TGF-beta on autoimmune disease expression vary depending on the timing of treatment with respect to disease induction. Daily i.p. injections of 0.2-2 μg TGF-beta 1 or TGF-beta 2 on days 5 to 9 after immunization were highly protective, while injections on days 1-5 or 9-13 were not. TGF-beta treatment on days 5-9 prevented the accumulation of T cells in brain and spinal cord, as assayed on days 15 to 20. Anti-TGF-beta accelerated and aggrevated EAE when administered on days 5 and 9, but not on day 12. It was concluded that the protective effect of TGF-beta is exerted at the level of the target organ, CNS and/or its vascular endothelium and that there was a small window of 4 days in which TGF-beta exerts its protective effect (Santambrogio, 1993).

Mice genetically targeted to overexpress bioactive TGF-beta1 specifically within astrocytes were reported to show a phenotype with severe CNS pathology at high levels of expression. While unmanipulated heterozygous transgenic mice from a low expressor line showed no such alterations, increasing TGF-beta 1 expression in this line by injury-induced astroglial activation or generation of homozygous offspring did result in the abnormal phenotype (Wyss-Coray, 95). Astroglial overexpression of TGF-beta 1 was not associated with obvious. CNS infiltration by hematogenous cells (Wyss-Coray, 1995). However, these mice were more susceptible to EAE-induction with earlier and more severe CNS inflammation. Thus, local expression of TGF-beta 1 within the CNS parenchyma can enhance immune cell infiltration and intensify the CNS impairment resulting from peripherally triggered autoimmune responses (Wyss-Coray 1997). An Alzheimer's disease-like pathology with perivascular astrocytosis and deposition of amyloid in cerebral blood vessels was observed in older mice expressing low-levels of transgenic active TGF-beta (Wyss-Coray, 2000).

Various strategies that were successful in modulating EAE and suggested TGF-beta as part of the protective effect proved not to be effective or showed considerable toxicity in clinical trials. In an open-label phase 1 trial of 11 patients with secondary progressive (SP) MS the safety of recombinant active TGF-beta2 was assessed (Calabresi, 1998). Groups of patients were treated in a dose-escalation scheme with 0.2 μg/kg, 0.6 μg/kg or 2.0 μg/kg. Treatment was administered i.v., three times weekly for four weeks unless discontinued earlier. A reversible decline in the glomerular filtration rate developed in five patients (three with 0.6 μg/kg, both with 2.0 μg/kg), transient mild to moderate anemia in seven, hypertension in two and a maculopathy in one patient. The nephrotoxicity and anemia were likely to be related to TGF-beta-treatment. A beneficial effect or an effect on clinical or imaging parameters was not observed (Calabresi, 1998).

These indications of systemic side-effects considerably lessened the interest in TGF-beta as a therapeutic tool for MS (Calabresi 1998; Wiendl 2000). In addition, in a phase III clinical trial of oral myelin tolerization in RRMS neither clinical nor MRI outcome parameters were significantly different between myelin and placebo-treated patients (Panitch 97, Francis 97).

However, it has also been shown that it is considerably more difficult to treat ongoing EAE by mucosal tolerization (discussion in Xu 2000) or TGF-beta itself (discussion in Thorbecke 2000) than to prevent disease.

While TGF-beta is one of the most potent growth-inhibitory substances known for most cell types, it stimulates proliferation of fibroblasts and osteoblasts. It is also a potent stimulator of extracellular matrix production by fibroblasts and osteoblasts (Massague, 1987; Sporn, 1987), inhibits matrix degradation and upregulates receptors for matrix interaction TGF-beta1 has been implicated as a key causative factor in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis (Border, 1994; Friedman, 1993) and at least as one crucial mediator of both the beneficial and detrimental effects of cyclosporine A on the immune system and the kidney (reviewed in (Khanna, 1999)). In addition, various chronic progressive fibrotic kidney disorders in humans and experimental models—be they glomerular or tubulointerstitial—have been shown to be associated with stimulation of the TGF-beta system (Bitzer, 1998). Administration of a neutralizing anti-TGF-beta-antibody resulted in the prevention of renal failure, excess matrix gene expression and glomerular mesangial matrix expansion in db/db diabetic mice (Ziyadeh, 2000).

Chronic TGF-beta upregulation plays a central role in progressive matrix accumulation and renal insufficiency observed in diabetic nephropathy (reviewed in Sharma and McGowan, 2000). The pathology of systemic multidose administration of recombinant human TGF-beta1 in rats and rabbits was described by Terrell (1993): A 14 day pilot study was performed in rats using rhTGF-beta1 produced in human A293 cells. After administration of 1000 μg/kg i.v. two rats died after 5 days. The remaining rats were sacrificed at that point. The mid-dose and low-dose-groups group received 100 μg/kg and 10 μg/kg i.v. daily for 14 days, respectively. Adverse events were most striking in the high-dose group but qualitatively similar changes were seen at the mid-dose level albeit less severe and delayed in onset. Besides certain histopathological changes, the rats displayed reduced body weight (from day 3) and an increased hematocrit on day 3 with a subsequent decrease. In the discussion of their findings Terrell and associates stated that the relative severity and rapidity with which some of the observed changes—both clinical and histopathological such as the hepatic involution and the enostosis—occurred in the high-dose preparations was remarkable (Terrell, 1993).

The use of TGF-beta for immunomodulation in humans is severely limited by its toxicity, including excessive stimulation of matrix production, nephrotoxicity and other detrimental effects. TGF-beta has oncogenic potential and has been implicated in glomerulopathies, pulmonary fibrosis, scleroderma and chronic graft versus host disease. In addition, while TGF-beta is an extremely potent immunosuppressive cytokine, several lines of evidence indicate that chronic stimulation of TGF-beta expression—both disease-related or in transgenic animal models—can paradoxically lead to or enhance autoimmune inflammation.

Recently, a potential explanation has been put forward suggesting that upmodulation of the Smad7 leads to a paralysis of TGF-beta signaling (Monteleone, 2001). The in vitro analysis carried out by Monteleone 2001 proposes that blocking of Smad7 may be beneficial in chronic inflammatory bowel disease, a disorder neither related to nor associated with disorders of the CNS. However, immunologically, chronic inflammatory bowel disease (CIBD) differs in many important aspects from CNS autoimmune inflammation. While the CNS is anatomically separated and protected from most circulating cells and exogenous agents by the blood-brain-barrier conveying the so-called “immunological privilege” of the CNS, the normal gut contains a rich lymphoid compartment maintaining a physiological inflammation induced and sustained by enteric flora and food antigens. The gut 's immune system constantly works to tolerize the individual against the ingested food and the normal enteric flora. This function is mediated by the special type of immune reactions induced in the gut, is related to the marked upregulation of TGF-beta after an antigen-specific oral challenge (Gonnella 1998) and represents the immunological background of “oral tolerization” against autoimmunity-inducing antigens from other tissues (such as myelin components) (Garside 2001). The gut's physiological inflammation is transformed in persistent destructive inflammation in chronic inflammatory bowel disease (Fiocchi 1998). Accordingly, while chronic inflammatory bowel diseases develop at the regular interface between the external world and the immune system and frequently cause further manifestations systemically (such as coagulation disorders) or in other organs such as joint or skin disease, the autoimmune inflammation and the manifestations of multiple sclerosis are limited to a rather secluded organ, the CNS. In addition, in TGF-beta1 knockout mice massive inflammatory lesions were found in several organs, including colon, but no significant histological lesions were seen in brain (Kulkarni, 1993).

Therefore, whereas the prior art has proposed the use of TGF-beta or an upregulation of TGF-beta signaling pathways for the treatment of infections, inflammations, or even tumor-formation, a corresponding systemic upregulation of TGF-beta has severe side-effects as described herein above.

There is a need in the art to develop effective drugs for the treatment of disorders of the CNS for in vivo therapy.

The solution to said technical problem is achieved by the embodiments characterized in the claims.

Accordingly, the present invention relates to the use of a specific inhibitor of Smad7 expression or function for the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition for the prevention, amelioration or treatment of a disease of the central nervous system and/or diseases related and/or caused by said disease of the central nervous system.

In accordance with the present invention, it has surprisingly be found that the neutralization or antagonization of Smad7 restores and/or positively modifies TGF-beta signaling pathways in cells in the nervous system without the side effects of TGF-beta treatment. Therefore, a medical intervention comprising Smad7 antagonists/inhibitors as described herein is therapeutically beneficial in the treatment of diseases of the nervous system, in particular of neurodegenerative disorders, autoimmune diseases as described herein, trauma or of stroke. The medical and therapeutical intervention as described herein is surprisingly not associated with the deleterious toxicity in various organs that have been documented in the prior art as being affected by systemic TGF-beta treatment.

The appended examples clearly document the beneficial systemical suppression of Smad7 which leads to a significant amelioration of diseases of the CNS, in particular of autoimmune diseases, like multiple sclerosis (MS) as well as conditions in which an inflammatory response makes a secondary contribution to tissue injury or repair such as trauma or (ischemic) stroke. Furthermore, the Smad7 inhibitors or antagonists as described herein are also useful in the treatment or prevention of neurodegenerative disorders, like Alzheimer's disease or Parkinson's disease.

Without being bound by theory, it is envisaged that pathways like the TGF-beta (BMP)-Smad signal transduction, the targeting of TGF-beta (BMP) receptors for proteolytic degradation via Smurf/ubiquitin ligase pathways, or the nuclear (or cytoplasmic) modulation of transcription events are positively modulated by the use of Smad7 inhibitors/antagonists as described herein. Particularly preferred is the use of these Smad7 antagonists/inhibitors in the treatment of CNS-disorders as described herein below. Most preferred is this use in the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of multiple sclerosis, ischemia, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, stroke and trauma.

The terms “treatment”, “treating” and the like are used herein to generally mean obtaining a desired pharmacological and/or physiological effect. The effect may be prophylactic in terms of completely or partially preventing a disease or symptom thereof and/or may be therapeutic in terms of partially or completely curing a disease and/or adverse effect attributed to the disease. The term “treatment” as used herein covers any treatment of a disease in a mammal, particularly a human, and includes: (a) preventing the disease from occurring in a subject which may be predisposed to the disease but has not yet been diagnosed as having it; (b) inhibiting the disease, i.e. arresting its development; or (c) relieving the disease, i.e. causing regression of the disease.

In a particular preferred embodiment, the present invention relates to the use as described herein above, wherein said specific Smad7 inhibitor/antagonist is selected from the group consisting of (small) binding molecules, intracellular-binding-partners or receptors, aptamers, intramers, RNAi (double stranded RNA, siRNA) and anti-Smad7 antisense molecules. Furthermore, said specific inhibitor/antagonist to be employed in context of the present invention may comprise truncated and/or mutated Smad7 molecules which interfere with the Smad7 and which, thereby, inhibit Smad7 function.

(Small) binding molecules comprise natural as well as synthetic compounds. The term “compound” in context of this invention comprises single substances or a plurality of substances. Said compound/binding molecules may be comprised in, for example, samples, e.g., cell extracts from, e.g., plants, animals or microorganisms. Furthermore, said compound(s) may be known in the art but hitherto not known to be capable of (negatively) influencing the activity Smad7 or not known to be capable of influencing the expression of the nucleic acid molecule encoding for Smad7, respectively. The plurality of compounds may be, e.g., added to a sample in vitro, to the culture medium or injected into the cell.

If a sample (collection of compounds) containing (a) compound(s) is identified in the art as a specific inhibitory binding molecule of Smad7, then it is either possible to isolate the compound from the original sample identified as containing the compound in question or one can further subdivide the original sample, for example, if it consists of a plurality of different compounds, so as to reduce the number of different substances per sample and repeat the method with the subdivisions of the original sample. It can then be determined whether said sample or compound displays the desired properties, i.e. the inhibition of Smad7, by methods known in the art. Depending on the complexity of the samples, the steps described above can be performed several times, preferably until the sample identified according to the screening method only comprises a limited number of or only one substance(s). Preferably said sample comprises substances of similar chemical and/or physical properties, and most preferably said substances are identical.

Binding molecules/inhibitory molecules for Smad7 may be deduced by methods in the art. Such methods comprise, e.g., but are not limited to methods, where a collection of substances is tested for interaction with Smad7 or with (a) fragment(s) thereof and where substances which test positive for interaction in a corresponding readout system are further tested in vivo, in vitro or in silico for their inhibitory effects on Smad7 expression or function.

Said “test for Smad7 interaction” of the above described method may be carried out by specific immunological, molecular biological and/or biochemical assays which are well known in the art and which comprise, e.g., homogenous and heterogenous assays as described herein below.

Said interaction assays employing read-out systems are well known in the art and comprise, inter alia, two hybrid screenings (as, described, inter alia, in EP-0 963 376, WO 98/25947, WO 00/02911), GST-pull-down columns, co-precipitation assays from cell extracts as described, inter alia, in Kasus-Jacobi, Oncogene 19 (2000), 2052-2059, “interaction-trap” systems (as described, inter alia, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,004,746) expression cloning (e.g. lamda gtII), phage display (as described, inter alia, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,541,109), in vitro binding assays and the like. Further interaction assay methods and corresponding read out systems are, inter alia, described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,525,490, WO 99/51741, WO 00/17221, WO 00/14271, WO 00/05410 or Yeast Four hybrid assays as described in Sandrok & Egly, JBC 276 (2001), 35328-35333.

Said interaction assays for Smad7 also comprise assays for FRET-assays, TR-FRETs (in “A homogenius time resolved fluorescence method for drug discovery” in: High throughput screening: the discovery of bioactive substances. Kolb, (1997) J.Devlin. NY, Marcel Dekker 345-360) or commercially available assays, like “Amplified Luminescent Proximity Homogenous Assay”, BioSignal Packard. Furthermore, the yeast-2-hybrid (Y2H) system may be employed to elucidate further particular and specific interaction, association partners of Smad7. Said interaction/association partners are further screened for their inhibitory effects.

Similarly, interacting molecules (for example) (poly)peptides may be deduced by cell-based techniques well known in the art. These assays comprise, inter alia, the expression of reporter gene constructs or “knock-in” assays, as described, for, e.g., the identification of drugs/small compounds influencing the (gene) expression of Smad7. Said “knock-in” assays may comprise “knock-in” of Smad7 (or (a) fragment(s) thereof) in tissue culture cells, as well as in (transgenic) animals. Examples for successful “knock-ins” are known in the art (see, inter alia, Tanaka, J. Neurobiol. 41 (1999), 524-539 or Monroe, Immunity 11 (1999), 201-212). Furthermore, biochemical assays may be employed which comprise, but are not limited to, binding of the Smad7 (or (a) fragment(s) thereof) to other molecules/(poly)peptides, peptides or binding of the Smad7 (or (a) fragment(s) thereof) to itself (themselves) (dimerizations, oligomerizations, multimerizations) and assaying said interactions by, inter alia, scintillation proximity assay (SPA) or homogenous time-resolved fluorescence assay (HTRFA).

Said “testing of interaction” may also comprise the measurement of a complex formation. The measurement of a complex formation is well known in the art and comprises, inter alia, heterogeneous and homogeneous assays. Homogeneous assays comprise assays wherein the binding partners remain in solution and comprise assays, like agglutination assays. Heterogeneous assays comprise assays like, inter alia, immuno assays, for example, ELISAs, RIAs, IRMAs, FIAs, CLIAs or ECLs.

As discussed below the interaction of the inhibiting molecules of Smad7 mRNA and Smad7 protein or fragments thereof may also be tested by molecular biological methods, like two-, three- or four-hybrid-assays, RNA protection assays, Northern blots, Western blots, micro-, macro- and Protein- or antibody arrays, dot blot assays, in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, quantitative PCR, coprecipitation, far western blotting, phage based expression cloning, surface plasmon resonance measurements, yeast one hybrid screening, DNAse I, footprint analysis, mobility shift DNA-binding assays, gel filtration chromatography, affinity chromatography, immunoprecipitation, one- or two dimensional gel electrophoresis, aptamer technologies, as well as high throughput synthesis and screening methods.

The compounds identified and/or obtained according to the above described method(s), in particular inhibitors of Smad7 or (a) fragment(s) thereof, are expected to be very beneficial as agents in pharmaceutical settings disclosed herein and to be used for medical purposes, in particular, in the treatment of the CNS-disorders described herein.

Compounds which may function as specific inhibition of Smad7 also comprise (small) organic compounds, like compounds which can be used in accordance with the present invention include, inter alia, peptides, proteins, nucleic acids including cDNA expression libraries, small organic compounds, ligands, PNAs and the like. Said compounds can also be functional derivatives or analogues. Methods for the preparation of chemical derivatives and analogues are well known to those skilled in the art and are described in, for example, Beilstein, “Handbook of Organic Chemistry”, Springer Edition New York, or in “Organic Synthesis”, Wiley, N.Y. Furthermore, said derivatives and analogues can be tested for their effects, i.e. their inhibitory effects of Smad7 according to methods known in the art. Furthermore, peptidomimetics and/or computer aided design of appropriate inhibitors of Smad7 can be used. Appropriate computer systems for the computer aided design of, e.g., proteins and peptides are described in the prior art, for example, in Berry, Biochem. Soc. Trans. 22 (1994), 1033-1036; Wodak, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 501 (1987), 1-13; Pabo, Biochemistry 25 (1986), 5987-5991. The results obtained from the above-described computer analysis can be used in combination with the method of the invention for, e.g., optimizing known compounds, substances or molecules. Appropriate compounds can also be identified by the synthesis of peptidomimetic combinatorial libraries through successive chemical modification and testing the resulting compounds, e.g., according to the methods described herein. Methods for the generation and use of peptidomimetic combinatorial libraries are described in the prior art, for example in Ostresh, Methods in Enzymology 267 (1996), 220-234 and Dorner, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 4 (1996), 709-715. Furthermore, the three-dimensional and/or crystallographic structure of inhibitors of Smad7 can be used for the design of (peptidomimetic) inhibitors of Smad7 (Rose, Biochemistry 35 (1996), 12933-12944; Rutenber, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 4 (1996), 1545-1558).

As mentioned herein above, the inhibitor of Smad7 expression or function may also comprise an aptamer.

In the context of the present invention, the term “aptamer” comprises nucleic acids such as RNA, ssDNA (ss=single stranded), modified RNA, modified ssDNA or PNAs which bind a plurality of target sequences having a high specificity and affinity. Aptamers are well known in the art and, inter alia, described in Famulok, Curr. Op. Chem. Biol. 2 (1998), 320-327. The preparation of aptamers is well known in the art and may involve, inter alia, the use of combinatorial RNA libraries to identify binding sites (Gold, Ann. Rev. Biochem. 64 (1995), 763-797).

Accordingly, aptamers are oligonucleotides derived from an in vitro evolution process called SELEX (systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment). Pools of randomized RNA or single stranded DNA sequences are selected against certain targets. The sequences of tighter binding with the targets are isolated and amplified. The selection is repeated using the enriched pool derived from the first round selection. Several rounds of this process lead to winning sequences that are called ‘aptamers’ or ‘ligands’. Aptamers have been evolved to bind proteins which are associated with a number of disease states. Using this method, many powerful antagonists of such proteins can be found. In order for these antagonists to work in animal models of disease and in humans, it is normally necessary to modify the aptamers. First of all, sugar modifications of nucleoside triphosphates are necessary to render the resulting aptamers resistant to nucleases found in serum. Changing the 2′OH groups of ribose to 2° F. or 2′NH2 groups yields aptamers which are long lived in blood. The relatively low molecular weight of aptamers (8000-12000) leads to rapid clearance from the blood. Aptamers can be kept in the circulation from hours to days by conjugating them to higher molecular weight vehicles. When modified, conjugated aptamers are injected into animals, they inhibit physiological functions known to be associated with their target proteins. Aptamers may be applied systemically in animals and humans to treat organ specific diseases (Ostendorf, 2001). The first aptamer that has proceeded to phase I clinical studies is NX-1838, an injectable angiogenesis inhibitor that can be potentially used to treat macular degeneration-induced blindness. (Sun, 2000). Cytoplasmatic expression of aptamers (“intramers”) may be used to inhibit intracellular targets (Blind, 1999; Mayer, 2001). Said intramers are also envisaged to be employed in context of this invention.

Said (other) receptors of Smad7 may, for example, be derived from (an) antibody(ies) against Smad7 by peptidomimetics. The specificity of the recognition implies that other known proteins, molecules are not bound. Further, Smad7-receptors which may function in context of this invention are SARA (Wu, 2000), STRAP (Datta, 2000), TGF-beta- or BMP-receptors or Smad2 (Kavasak, 2000). It is in particular envisaged that peptide fragments of such “natural” Smad7-receptors are employed.

The RNAi-approach is also envisaged in context of this invention for use in the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of CNS-diseases disclosed herein.

The term RNA interference (RNAi) describes the use of double-stranded RNA to target specific mRNAs for degradation, thereby silencing their expression. Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) matching a gene sequence is synthesized in vitro and introduced into a cell. The dsRNA feeds into a natural, but only partially understood process including the highly conserved nuclease dicer (Hutvagner, 2001; Grishok, 2001), which cleaves dsRNA precursor molecules into short interfering RNAs (siRNAs). The generation and preparation of siRNA(s) as well as the method for inhibiting the expression of a target gene is, inter alia, described in WO 021055693, Wei (2000) Dev. Biol. 15, 239-255; La Count (2000), Biochem. Paras. 111, 67-76, Baker (2000) Curr. Biol. 10, 1071-1074, Svoboda (2000), Development 127, 4147-4156 or Marie (2000) Curr. Biol. 10, 289-292. These siRNAs built then the sequence specific part of an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), a multicomplex nuclease that destroys messenger RNAs homologous to the silencing trigger. One protein-part of the ribonucleoprotein complex has been identified as Argonaute2 (Hammond, 2001). Elbashir (2001) showed that duplexes of 21 nucleotide RNAs may be used in cell culture to interfere with gene expression in mammalian cells.

Methods to deduce and construct siRNAs are in the art and are described in Elbashir et al., 2002, at the internet web sites of commercial vendors of siRNA, e.g. Xeragon Inc.(www.xeragon.com/siRNA support.html); Dharmacon (www.dharmacon.com;); Xeragon Inc. (www.xeragon.com;), and Ambion (www.ambion.com), or at the web site of the research group of Tom Tuschl (http://www.mpibpc.qwdq.de/abteilungen/100/105/sirna.html). In addition, programs are available online to deduce siRNAs from a given mRNA sequence (e.g. http://www.ambion.com/techlib/misc/siRNA finder.html or http://katahdin.cshl.org:9331/RNAVi/). These were used to deduce the siRNA molecules listed below (RNAi 1-20, SEQ ID NO: 44-83). Uridine residues in the 2-nt 3′ overhang can be replaced by 2′deoxythymidine without loss of activity, which significantly reduces costs of RNA synthesis and may also enhance resistance of siRNA duplexes when applied to mammalian cells (Elbashir, 2001). This modification is also incorporated in citing SEQ Ids 44-83 (see below) of the present application. The siRNAs may also be sythesized enzymatically using T7 or other RNA polymerases (Donze, 2002). Short RNA duplexes that mediate effective RNA interference (esiRNA) may also be produced by hydrolysis with Escherichia coli Rnase III (Yang, 2002) Furthermore, expression vectors have been developed to express double stranded siRNAs connected by small hairpin RNA loops in eukaryotic cells (e.g. (Brummelkamp, 2002)). All of these constructs may by developed with the help of the programs named above. In addition, commercially available sequence prediction tools incorporated in sequence analysis programs or sold separately, e.g. the siRNA Design Tool offered by www.oligoEngine.com (Seaftle, Wash.) may be used for siRNA sequence prediction.

Accordingly, the present invention also provides for the use of specific interfering RNAs as inhibitors of Smad7 expression and/or function. Preferably, said (small) interfering RNAs (siRNAs) comprise at least 10, more preferably at least 12, more preferably at least 14, more preferably at least 16, more preferably at least 18 nucleotides. In a particular preferred embodiment these siRNAs are selected from the group consisting of RNAi1: nt 298-318 5′-GUUCAGGACCAAACGAUCUGC-3′, (SEQ ID NO:44) nt 318-296 5′-GCAGAUCGUUUGGUCCUGAACAU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:45) RNAi2: nt 578-598 5′-CUCACGCACUCGGUGCUCAAG-3′, (SEQ ID NO:46) nt 598-576 5′-CUUGAGCACCGAGUGCGUGAGCG-3′; (SEQ ID NO:47) RNAi3: nt 209-227 5′-CUCGGCGCCCGACUUCUUCuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:48) nt 227-207 5′-GAAGAAGUCGGGCGCCGAGUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:49) RNAi4: nt 266-284 5′-ACGACUUUUCUCCUCGCCUuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:50) nt 284-264 5-AGGCGAGGAGAAAAGUCGUUU-3′; (SEQ ID NO:51) RNAi5: nt 310-328 5′-ACGAUCUGCGCUCGUCCGGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:52) nt 328-308 5′-CCGGACGAGCGCAGAUCGUUU-3′; (SEQ ID NO:53) RNAi6: nt 574-592 5′-GGCGCUCACGCACUCGGUGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:54) nt 592-572 5′-CACCGAGUGCGUGAGCGCCUU-3′; (SEQ ID NO:55) RNAi7: nt 607-625 5′-GGAGCGGCAGCUGGAGCUGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:56) nt 625-605 5′-CAGCUCCAGCUGCCGCUCCUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:57) RNAi8: nt 778-796 5′-AGUGUUCAGGUGGCCGGAUuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:58) nt 796-776 5′-AUCCGGCCACCUGAACACUuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:59) RNAi9: nt 815-833 5′-GUCAAGAGGCUGUGUUGCUuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:60) nt 833-813 5′-AGCAACACAGCCUCUUGACUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:61) RNAi10: nt 820-838 5′-GAGGCUGUGUUGCUGUGAAuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:62) nt 838-818 5′-UUCACAGACACACAGCCUCUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:63) RNAi11: nt 839-857 5′-UCUUACGGGAAGAUCAACCuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:64) nt 857-837 5′-GGUUGAUCUUCCCGUAAGAUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:65) RNAi12: nt 850-868 5′-GAUCAACCCCGAGCUGGUGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:66) nt 868-848 5′-CACCAGCUCGGGGUUGAUCUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:67) RNAi13: nt 856-874 5′-CCCCGAGCUGGUGUGCUGCuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:68) nt 874-854 5′-GCAGCACACCAGCUCGGGGUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:69) RNAi14: nt 1008-1026 5′-CGAAUUAUCUGGCCCCUGGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:70) nt 1026-1006 5′-CCAGGGGCCAGAUAAUUCGUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:71) RNAi15: nt 1046-1064 5′-CUUCUUCUGGAGCCUGGGGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:72) nt 1064-1044 5′-CCCCAGGCUCCAGAAGAAGUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:73) RNAi16: nt 1177-1195 5′-UGGCUUUUGCCUCGGACAGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:74) nt 1195-1175 5′-CUGUCCGAGGCAAAAGCCAUU-3, (SEQ ID NO:75) RNAi17: nt 1201-1219 5′-UUCGGACAACAAGAGUCAGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:76) nt 1219-1199 5′-CUGACUCUUGUUGUCCGAAUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:77) RNAi18: nt 1297-1315 5′-CCGCAGCAGUUACCCCAUCuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:78) nt 1315-1295 5′-GAUGGGGUAACUGCUGCGGUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:79) RNAi19: nt 1324-1342 5′-GUCCGCCACACUGGACAACuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:80) nt 1342-1322 5′-GUUGUCCAGUGUGGCGGACUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:81) RNAi20: nt 1342-1360 5′-CCCGGACUCCAGGACGCUGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:82) nt 1360-1340 5′-CAGCGUCCUGGAGUCCGGGUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:83)

sRNAi are used in pair combinations. The above pairs comprise SEQ ID NO:44 combined with SEQ ID NO:45 (RNAi1), and SEQ ID NO:46 combined with SEQ ID NO:47 (RNAi2), and are useful for the treatment of human patients. Further pairs envisonaged are: SEQ ID NO:48 combined with SEQ ID NO:49, SEQ ID NO:50 combined with SEQ ID NO:51, SEQ ID NO:52 combined with SEQ ID NO:53, SEQ ID NO:54 combined with SEQ ID NO:55, SEQ ID NO:56 combined with SEQ ID NO:57, SEQ ID NO:58 combined with SEQ ID NO:59, SEQ ID NO:60 combined with SEQ ID NO:61, SEQ ID NO:62 combined with SEQ ID NO:63, SEQ ID NO:64 combined with SEQ ID NO:65, SEQ ID NO:66 combined with SEQ ID NO:67, SEQ ID NO:68 combined with SEQ ID NO:69, SEQ ID NO:70 combined with SEQ ID NO:71, SEQ ID NO:72 combined with SEQ ID NO:73, SEQ ID NO:74 combined with SEQ ID NO:75, SEQ ID NO:76 combined with SEQ ID NO:77, SEQ ID NO:78 combined with SEQ ID NO:79, SEQ ID NO:80 combined with SEQ ID NO:81, SEQ ID NO:82 combined with SEQ ID NO:83.

As illustrated in the appended examples siRNAs are a powerfull approach in the treatment of CNS disorders.

In addition, novel methods to identify molecules useful to inhibit smad7 RNA or smad7 RNA/protein (smad7 RNP complexes), including nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and fluorescence binding assays, have been summarized in (Hermann, 2000) and (DeJong, 2002), and in the references cited therein.

In a preferred embodiment of the invention the intracellular binding partner or receptor of Smad7 expression and/or function is an intracellular antibody.

Intracellular antibodies are known in the art and can be used to neutralize or modulate the functional activity of the target molecule. This therapeutic approach is based on intracellular expression of recombinant antibody fragments, either Fab or single chain Fv, targeted to the desired cell compartment using appropriate targeting sequences (summarized in Teillaud, 1999).

As mentioned herein above, preferably the inhibitor of Smad7 expression and/or function is an antisense molecule. Preferably said anti-Smad7 antisense molecule comprises a nucleic acid molecule which is the complementary strand of a reversed complementary strand of the coding region of Smad7.

Coding regions of Smad7 are known in the art and comprise, inter alia, the Smad7 GenBank entries for mouse Smad7 NM_(—)008543, AJ00551, AJ000550, the Smad7 rat sequences NM_(—)030858, AH008243, AF156730, AF156729, AF156728, AF156727, AF156726, AF042499 or the human Smad7 sequences entries in GenBank as XM_(—)033746, XM_(—)008803, AF015261 or AF010193. The person skilled in the art may easily deduce the relevant coding region of Smad7 in these GenBank entries, which may also comprise the entry of genomic DNA as well as mRNA/cDNA.

Furthermore, it is also envisaged that the antisense molecules against Smad7 expression or function interfere specifically with promoter regions of Smad7. Such promoter regions are known in the art and comprise, inter alia, GenBank entries AF254791 (human), AF156731 (human) or AF188834 (mouse).

It is envisaged that the antisense molecules to be used in accordance with the present invention inhibit the expression or function of Smad7, in particular of human Smad7 and interact with Smad7 as expressed by the coding regions, mRNAs/cDNAs as deposited under the above mentioned GenBank accession numbers as well as with Smad7 as expressed by isoforms and variants of said Smad7. Said isoforms or variants may, inter.alia, comprise allelic variants or splice variants.

The term “variant” means in this context that the Smad7 nucleotide sequence and the encoded Smad7 amino acid sequence, respectively, differs from the distinct sequences available under said GenBank Accession numbers, by mutations, e.g. deletion, additions, substitutions, inversions etc.

Therefore, the antisense-molecule to be employed in accordance with the present invention specifically interacts with/hybridizes to one or more nucleic acid molecules encoding Smad7. Preferably said nucleic acid molecule is RNA, i.e. pre m-RNA or mRNA. The term “specifically interacts with/hybridizes to one or more nucleic acid molecules encoding Smad7” relates, in context of this invention, to antisense molecules which are capable of interfering with the expression of Smad7. As illustrated in the appended examples, antisense constructs, like “Smad7-mut4-as” (an antisense construct comprising 4 mutations) is not capable of specifically interacting with and/or hybridizing to one or more nucleic acid sequences encoding Smad7. Accordingly, highly mutated anti-Smad7 antisense constructs, which are not capable of hybridizing to or specifically interacting with Smad7-coding nucleic acid molecules are not to be employed in the uses of the present invention. The person skilled in the art can easily deduce whether an antisense construct specifically interacts with/hybridizes to Smad7 encoding sequences. These tests comprise, but are not limited to hybridization assays, RNAse protection assays, Northern Blots, North-western blots, nuclear magnetic resonance and fluorescence binding assys, dot blots, micro- and macroarrays and quantitative PCR. In addition, such a screening may not be restricted to Smad7 mRNA molecules, but may also include Smad7 mRNA/protein (RNP) complexes (Hermann, 2000; DeJong et al., 2002). Furthermore, functional tests as provided in the appended examples are envisaged for testing whether a particular antisense construct is capable of specifically interacting with/hybridizing to the Smad7 encoding nucleic acid molecules. These functional assays comprise in vitro T-cell activation assays; see, inter alia, example 11. These functional tests may also include Western blots, immunohistochemistry, immunoprecipitation assay, and bioassays based on TGFbeta responsive promoters.

Yet, as also documented in the appended examples mutated and/or modified antisense constructs may also be employed in accordance with this invention, provided that said mutated and/or modified antisense constructs are capable of specifically interacting with and/or hybridizing to the coding sequences of Smad7.

Antisense molecules of Smad7 have been described in the prior art. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,697 describes antisense compounds comprising such antisense-molecules. Yet, U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,697 employs said compounds in the treatment of diseases which are associated with Smad7 expression. In contrast, the present invention provides for a specific medical/therapeutic intervention, where no diseases/conditions associated with Smad7 expression are to be treated, but specific disorders of the central nervous system where the systemic administration of TGF-beta was shown to be detrimental.

The term “antisense-molecule” as used herein comprises in particular antisense oligonucleotides. Said antisense oligonucleotides may also comprise modified nucleotides as well as modified internucleoside-linkage, as, inter alia, described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,697.

Most preferably, the antisense oligonucleotides of the present invention comprise at least 8, more preferably at least 10, more preferably at least 12, more preferably at least 14, more preferably at least 16 nucleotides. The deduction as well as the preparation of antisense molecules is very well known in the art. The deduction of antisense molecules is, inter alia, described in Smith, 2000. Usual methods are “gene walking”, RnaseH mapping, RNase L mapping (Leaman and Cramer, 1999), combinatorial oligonucleotide arrays on solid support, determination of secondary structure analysis by computational methods (Walton, 2000), aptamer oligonucleotides targeted to structured nucleic acids (aptastruc), thetered oligonucleotide probes, foldback triplex-forming oligonucleotides (FTFOs) (Kandimalla, 1994) and selection of sequences with minimized non-specific binding (Han, 1994).

Preferably, the antisense molecules of the present invention are stabilized against degradation. Such stabilization methods are known in the art and, inter alia, described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,697. Further methods described to protect oligonucleotides from degradation include oligonucleotides bridged by linkers (Vorobjev, 2001), minimally modified molecules according to cell nuclease activity (Samani, 2001), 2′O-DMAOE oligonucleotides (Prakash, 2001), 3′5′-Dipeptidyl oligonucleotides (Schwope, 1999), 3′methylene thymidine and 5-methyluridine/cytidine h-phosphonates and phosphonamidites (An, 2001), as well as anionic liposome (De Oliveira, 2000) or ionizable aminolipid (Semple, 2001) encapsulation.

In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the antisense molecule is a nucleic acid molecule which is the complementary strand of a reversed complementary strand of the coding region of Smad7 is selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 1, SEQ ID NO: 3 or SEQ ID NO: 5. Sequences as depicted in SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3 or 5 represent illustrative coding regions (mRNA) of human, mouse or rat Smad7. SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4 and 6 represent translated Smad7 of human, mouse or rat, respectively. Accordingly, in context of this invention and as stressed herein above, the Smad7 inhibitors to be employed in the uses described herein, preferably, interact with promoter and/or coding regions of nucleic acid molecules which code for or lead to the expression of Smad7 molecules or shown in SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4 or 6. It is also envisaged that, e.g., antisense constructs designed and used in accordance with this invention inhibit the expression of functional homologues, variants (for example allelic variants) or isoforms of Smad7-molecules as shown in SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4 or 6.

In context of this invention, the term “coding region of Smad7” comprises not only the translated region of Smad7 cds, but also comprises untranslated regions. Accordingly, the anti-Smad7 antisense molecule to be used and employed in accordance with this invention may be antisense molecules which bind to/interact with mRNA sequences comprising untranslated region. Accordingly, the “coding region of Smad7” as depicted in SEQ ID NO: 1, 3 and 5 comprises the full mRNA sequences of Smad7.

In a most preferred embodiment of the present invention, the anti-Smad7 antisense molecule to be employed in the uses of the invention or the methods described herein is selected from a nucleic acid molecule as shown in the following table:

Preferably, Smad7-Antisense Oligonucleotides, derived from mouse sequences (5′-3′-direction) are: cttcggctgccccacccg (SEQ ID NO: 7) NM_008543, nt 1179-1196, 5′UT atcgtttggtcctgaacat (SEQ ID NO: 8) NM_008543, nt 1437-1455, cds ccctcctcctcgtcctcg (SEQ ID NO: 9) NM_008543, nt 1499-1516, cds gtcgccccttctccccgcag (SEQ ID NO. 10) NM_008543, nt 1545-1564, cds gccgtccgtcgccccttc (SEQ ID NO: 11) NM_008543, nt 1554-1571, cds agcaccgagtgcgtgagc (SEQ ID NO: 12) NM_008543, nt 1718-1735, cds agttcacagagtcgacta (SEQ ID NO: 13) NM_008543, nt 2030-2047, cds ggcaaaagccattcccct (SEQ ID NO: 14) NM_008543, nt 2311-2328, cds gccgatcttgctccgcac (SEQ ID NO: 15) NM_008543, nt 2373-2430, cds, cds

Relevant mouse Smad7 Genbank entries are NM_(—)008543 (mRNA sequence) and AJ000551 (mRNA, variation Smad7B, lacks “cag” (nt 2104-2106 in NM_(—)008543).

Most preferably Smad7-Antisense Oligonucleotides of Human sequences (5′-3′-direction) are: ctccggctgccccacccc (SEQ ID NO: 16) AF010193, nt 38-54, 5′UT cgaacatgacctccgcac (SEQ ID NO: 17) AF010193, nt 243-250, 5′UT atcgtttggtcctgaacat (SEQ ID NO: 18) AF010193, nt 296-314, cds ccctcctcctcgtcctcg (SEQ ID NO: 19) AF010193, nt 358-375, cds gtcgccccttctccccgcag (SEQ ID NO: 20) AF010193, nt 404-423, cds gctgtccgtcgccocttc (SEQ ID NO: 21) AF010193, nt 413-430, cds agcaccgagtgcgtgagc (SEQ ID NO: 22) AF010193, nt 577-594, cds agttcgcagagtcggcta (SEQ ID NO: 23) AF010193, nt 889-906, cds ggcaaaagccattcccct (SEQ ID NO: 24) AF010193, nt 1170-1187, cds gccgattttgctccgcac (SEQ ID NO: 25) AF010193, nt 1232-1249, cds ctgccccttcttccaaaa (SEQ ID NO: 26) AF010193, nt 1790-1807, 3′UT actcacacacactcctga (SEQ ID NO: 27) AF010193, nt 1905-1928, 3′UT tgcccaggtactgcctct (SEQ ID NO: 28) AF010193, nt 2076-2093, 3′UT gagatccaggagcagatg (SEQ ID NO: 29) AF010193, nt 2310-2327, 3′UT

Here, the most relevant human Smad7 Genbank entries are AF010193 (Smad7 mRNA, complete cds), XM_(—)033746 (MADH7 mRNA, variation 1213:/allele=“C”/allele=“T”) and XM_(—)008803 (MADH7 mRNA, variation 1500:/allele=“C”/allele=“T”)

Rat Smad7-Antisense Oligonucleotides (5′-3′-direction) which are preferred are: cttcggctgccccacccg (SEQ ID NO: 30) NM_030858, nt 1164-1181, 5′UT atcgtttggtcctgaacat (SEQ ID NO: 31) NM_030858, nt 1422-1440, cds ccctcctcctcgtcctcg (SEQ ID NO: 32) NM_030858, nt 1484-1501, cds gtcgccccttctccccgcag (SEQ ID NO: 33) NM_030858, nt 1530-1549, cds gccgtccgtcgccccttc (SEQ ID NO: 34) NM_030858, nt 1539-1556, cds agcaccgagtgcgtgagc (SEQ ID NO: 35) NM_030858, nt 1703-1720, cds agttcacagagtcgacta (SEQ ID NO: 36) NM_030858, nt 2015-2032, cds ggcaaaagccattcccct (SEQ ID NO: 37) NM_030858, nt 2296-3013, cds gccgatcttgctcctcac (SEQ ID NO: 38) NM_030858, nt 2358-2375, cds

Here, the relevant rat Smad7 Genbank entry is NM_(—)030858 (mRNA, complete cds).

Furthermore, as documented in the appended examples and explained herein, modified and/or mutated oligonucleotides are envisaged in accordance with this invention, an example of such a oligonucleotide (5′-3′-direction) is gtcgccccttctcccccgcag (SEQ ID NO: 39).

Preferably, the antisense molecules to be employed in accordance with the present invention are 100% complementary to the mRNA (coding and/or non-coding region) of Smad7 as shown herein; e.g. SEQ ID NO: 1, 3 or 5 or as shown in GenBank accession numbers NM_(—)008543 (mouse), AF010193 (human), NM_(—)030858 (rat). Yet, it is also envisaged that said antisense molecule comprises additional nucleotides, substituted nucleotides, nucleotide exchanges, nucleotide inversions or nucleotide deletions. However, as documented in the appended examples, functional antisense molecules to be employed in the present invention are preferably more than 85%, more preferably more than 90%, most preferably more than 95% complementary to the Smad7 mRNA (coding region and/or non-coding region). For example, most effective anti-Smad7 molecules/antisense molecules comprise nucleotides which are 100% complementary to the corresponding mRNA. Yet, as also shown in the appended examples, antisense molecules comprising, inter alia, one or two additional nucleotides are functional in context of the invention.

The invention also relates to a method for preventing, ameliorating and/or treating a disease of the central nervous system and/or of diseases related and/or caused by said disease in a subject comprising administering a specific inhibitor of Smad7 expression or function as defined herein above to a subject in need thereof. Preferably, said subject is a mammal, most preferably said mammal is a human.

A “patient” or “subject” for the purposes of the present invention includes both humans and other animals, particularly mammals, and other organisms. Thus, the methods are applicable to both human therapy and veterinary applications. In the preferred embodiment the patient is a mammal, and in the most preferred embodiment the patient is human.

In a most preferred embodiment of the invention, the disease of the CNS to be treated by the pharmaceutical composition comprising a herein defined anti-Smad7 inhibitor is an autoimmune disease of the CNS, trauma or is cerebral ischemic stroke. Preferably, said trauma is traumatic brain injury TBI) or traumatic spinal cord injury and said cerebral ischemic stroke is “focal cerebral ischemia”. However, global cerebral ischemia, hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, CNS hypoxia and diseases or conditions related and/or caused by said diseases share pathogenetic features including upregulation of TGF-beta with focal cerebral ischemia and therefore are candidates for the treatment with Smad7 inhibitors. The appended examples illustrate the successful and inventive use of Smad7 inhibitors as defined herein in the treatment of these diseases/disorders. Preferably, said autoimmune disease is multiple sclerosis. Said multiple sclerosis may be selected from the group consisting of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, primary chronic progressive multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica (Devic's syndrome), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, fulminant multiple sclerosis (Marburg's variant), isolated autoimmune optic neuritis, isolated autoimmune transverse myelitis, Balo's concentric sclerosis. All of the aforementioned diseases are considered subtypes of MS or are CNS autoimmune diseases related to MS or common early stages of MS prior to clinical definite diagnosis of MS according to the art. Cerebral ischemic stroke and CNS trauma involve pathological mechanisms that are shared with MS and subtypes, e.g. leakage of the blood brain barrier, influx of immune cells, and microglial activation, leading to a inflammatory-mediated secondary damage to brain tissue which can be downregulated by application of antiinflammatory molecules like TGF-beta. Stroke, e.g. focal hypoxic-ischemic damage of the brain is characterized by a central necrotic tissue lesion and a surrounding “penumbra” which can be described as “tissue at risk”. Neuronal cells within this zone are still prone to die for an extended period of time. TGF-beta expression was reported to be significantly increased in the penumbra (Slevin, Gunsilius, 2001), and interpreted as an indication of the amount of salvageable brain (Ali, 2001). The acute local inflammatory response following cerebral ischemia is thought to cause part of the perifocal brain injury. Adenoviral-mediated overexpression of TGF-beta 1 five days before MCA-occlusion resulted in inhibition of the chemokines MCP-1 and MIP1-alpha and a significantly reduced infarct volume (Pang, 2001). However, when administered after induction of cerebral ischemia via the contralateral carotid artery in a rabbit model of thromboembolic stroke TGF-beta did not have significant effect regarding infarct size or production of excitatory amino acid levels (Gross, 1994). Nevertheless, TGF-beta apparently has neuroprotective effects in vivo, as blockade of TGF-beta interaction with its receptor aggrevated the volume of infarction in a rat model of stroke (Ruocco, 1999). Therefore it can be estimated that amplification of signaling via TGF-beta has a beneficial effect in stroke by saving the not lethally damaged surrounding cells and finally reducing the infarct volume. With regard to global brain ischemia the upregulation of TGF-beta1 gene expression in brain tissue extends from 6 hours to 21 days (Lehrmann, 1995). Maximum of TGF-beta1 gene induction was demonstrated to occur between 5 and 7 days after ischemia (Zhu, 2000). The local intraparenchymal injection of TGF-beta1 attenuated apoptosis and improved postischemic neurological outcome (Zhu, 2002). In transient global ischemia in rats, Henrich-Noack and colleagues were able to show significant protection of pyramidal CA1 cells by intrahippocampal injection of TGF-beta1 prior to ischemia. Several in vivo studies analyzed the effect of intraarterial or intracerebroventricular administration of TGF-beta1 before (Gross, 1993) or after induction of ischemia (Gross, 1994, McNeill, 1994) in a rabbit model of thromboembolic stroke or a rat model of severe hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, respectively. These studies showed that either treatment regimen was associated with a significant reduction of neuronal loss and infarct size. In transient global ischemia in rats, Henrich-Noack and colleagues were able to show significant protection of pyramidal CA1 cells by intrahippocampal injection of TGF-beta1 prior to ischemia (Henrich-Noack, 1996). Similar effects of increased lesion sizes after application of TGF-beta antagonists in animal models of excitotoxic damage to the brain suggest that approaches upregulating TFG-beta effects might be used to protect from acute excitotoxic injury occurring in traumatic CNS injury (Hailer, 2001). In some patients with acute traumatic brain injury an intracerebral production of TGF-beta peaking at the first day post trauma and possibly conferring a protection against secondary inflammation-induced brain damage was reported (Morganti-Kossmann, 1999).

As mentioned herein above, further diseases related and/or caused by diseases of the central nervous system may be treated by the use of Smad7 inhibitor, Smad7 antagonist or anti-Smad7 substances as defined herein. These diseases or disorders may be selected from the group consisting of diabetes, in particular type I diabetes mellitus. Type I diabetes mellitus is an organ-specific autoimmune disease and as such comparable to multiple sclerosis. In addition, recent studies have suggested that patients with type I diabetes display increased reactivity of peripheral blood T cells to central nervous system antigens while patients with multiple sclerosis show significant immune responses to pancreatic islet antigens (Winer, 2001a). This pattern of interrelated autoimmune T cell reactivity is also found in animal models of spontaneous insulin-dependent diabetes. In addition there are similarities in the T cell response to environmental antigens such as cow milk protein (Winer, 2001b).

It is also envisaged that the anti-Smad7, Smad7-inhibitor or Smad7 antagonists as defined herein are employed in the treatment or prevention of neurodegenerative disorders, like Alzheimeres disease or Parkinson's disease.

Most preferably, the pharmaceutical composition to be prepared in accordance with this invention and comprising an anti-Smad7 expression and/or function inhibitor(s) is to be administered by one or several of the following modes: Administration can be oral, intravenous, intraarterial, intratracheal, intranasal, subcutaneous, intramuscular, intracranial ( i.e. intraventricular) or intraspinal (intrathecal), epidermal or transdermal, pulmonary (e.g. inhalation or insufflation of aerosol or powder), by delivery to the oral or rectal mucosa as well as ophthalmic delivery.

It is, inter alia, envisaged that Smad7 inhibitors, like the antisense constructs/molecules or siRNAs described herein, are administered in combination with further compounds/medicaments. Said further compound/medicament or molecule may, e.g., induce an upmodulation of TGF-beta or may activate latent TGF-beta. Said further compound/medicament/molecule may also be an immunomodulator or an immunosuppressive drug. Such immunomodulators are known in the art and comprise, inter alia, (recombinant) human interferon-beta la, (recombinant) human interferon-beta 1b or glatiramer acetate and other drugs/compounds that modulate the activation, migration, effector function and/or survival of immune cells. Such compounds may be antibodies or antibody fragments directed against molecules expressed on cell surfaces (such as adhesion molecules, cytokine or chemokine receptors, or receptors for ligands contributing to immune cell activation or immune cell effector functions) or against circulating molecules such as cytokines, chemokines, or ligands for receptors mediating immune cell activation or immune cell effector functions. Such compounds may also comprise synthetic agonists or inhibitors for cytokine and chemokine receptors or other endogeneous molecules, such as adhesion molecules or intracellular transcription or activation modulatory molecules. Such compounds may also comprise molecules aimed at modulating antigen specific immune responses (e.g. altered peptide ligands, T-cell receptor vaccination, DNA vaccination, or other strategies to modify immune responses). The substances/drugs to be administered with anti-Smad7 compounds/Smad7 inhibitors described herein may compromise further substances that supress growth or activation of immune cells like azathioprine, mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetile, rapamycine, minocycline or methotrexate. Other drugs/compounds envisaged of immune cells and/or the activation, migration, effector function and/or survival of immune cells. The immunosuppressive substances/drugs to be administered with the anti-Smad7 compounds/Smad7 inhibitors described herein may comprise azathioprine, mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetile, cyclosporine A, rapamycine, minocycline or methotrexate.

Dosage and administration regimes for the Smad7-inhibitors may be established by the physician. For example, for antisense compounds, like antisense-nucleotides specific dosage regimes have been established. Such regimes comprise a dosage of 1 mg/kg up to 200 mg/m² and are, inter alia, described in Schreibner (2001), Gastroenterology 120, 1399-1345; Andrews (2001), J. Clin. Oncol. 19, 2189-2200; Blay (2000), Curr. Op. Mol. Ther. 2, 468-472; Cunnigham (2000), Clin. Cancer Res. 6, 1626-1631; Waters (2000), J. Clin. Oncol. 18, 1809-1811 or Yacyshyn (1998), Gastroenterology 114, 1133-1142. It is, for example, envisaged that the Smad7 inhibitors described herein, e.g. antisense compounds or RNAi and the like, be administered in single doses of 0.1 to 25 mg/kg/die (for example i.v. over 2 to 8 hours), as single or multiple doses every other day or by continuous infusion(s) of 0.5 to 10 mg/kg/die over 14 to 21 days with 7 day rest. It is of particular note that in certain clinical or medical indications it might be desirable to administer the Smad7-inhibitors as disclosed herein in a single dose. For example, in an acute traumatic incident (trauma of brain or spinal cord) or in an ischemic event in the brain (e.g. stroke) a single administration of the Smad7-inhibitors may suffice to ameliorate the condition of the affected patient, preferably human patient. In other disorders of the CNS, like immunological disorders (e.g. MS), a treatment regime of multiple administrations may be desired. Yet, further dosage regimes are envisaged and may easily be established by a physician.

The Figures show:

FIG. 1.

Preventive Smad7-as-ODN-treatment delays onset and alleviates clinical severity of EAE. Naive mice were injected with 30×10⁶ PLP-specific LNC as described in Materials and Methods. In a preventive setting 100 μg Smad7-as-ODN (5 mg/kg/d) in PBS or an equal volume of PBS were injected i.p. daily from the day of transfer until the onset of clinical signs in the-control group (day 8). The onset of disease was significantly delayed from day 14.29±1.10 (mean±SE) to day 27.43±4.28 (p=0.029; Table 1).

FIG. 2.

Smad7-as-ODN treatment effect is potentially long lasting and may be dose dependend. Naive mice were injected with 30×10⁶ PLP-specific LNC as described in Materials and Methods. 100 μg of Smad7-as-ODN (5 mg/kg/d) in PBS or an equal volume of PBS were injected i.p. daily from the day of transfer for 3 weeks, every other day for the following 2 weeks and twice weekly for the remaining 5 weeks. The difference in median clinical scores between the experimental groups was statistically significant between days 15 and 26, on days 28, 40, 41, 50, 53, and between days 60 and 64 (p≦0.05). At day 40 the EAE-prevalence in the treatment group was 0/6, suggesting a continuous treatment of 5 mg/kg three times weekly to be sufficient for disease suppression.

FIG. 3.

Smad7-as2-ODN-treatment delays onset and alleviates clinical course of EAE. Naive mice were injected with 5×10⁶ PLP-specific LNC as described in Materials and Methods. 100 μg antisense oligonucleotides (5 mg/kg/d) in PBS or an equal volume of PBS were injected i.p. daily from the day of transfer until the end of experiment. The onset of disease was delayed in the Smad7-as2-ODN group from day 10.4±1.66 (mean+SE) to day 15.8±3.69 (Table 3). Smad7-as2-ODN had a more powerful effect than Smad7-as-ODN, whereas Smad7-mut4-as-ODN (an antisense-construct which is not capable of specifically hybridizing to the relevant Smad7 encoding nucleic acid molecule) deteriorated the clinical course.

FIG. 4.

Smad7-as-ODN suppresses the clinical severity of EAE in a therapeutic manner. Naive mice were injected with 30×10⁶ PLP-specific LNC as described in Materials and Methods. Mice were divided in treatment groups of equal EAE-incidence and cumulative score at the peak of disease (day 12). 100 μg of Smad7-as-ODN (5 mg/kg/d) in PBS or an equal volume of PBS were injected i.p. daily from day 12 to day 28 and subsequently every other day from day 29 to day 45. The difference in mean EAE-score between the two groups was statistically significant between days 18 and 20 and between days 26 and 32 (p≦0.05).

FIG. 5.

CNS autoimmune disease is preventable by exposing autoreactive LNC to Smad7-as treatment in vitro. LNC were obtained from PLP-immunized mice as described in Materials and Methods and restimulated for 96 hours with 10 μg/ml PLP and 20 μM Smad7-as-ODN or PBS, respectively. The proliferation was reduced by approximately 30% as measured by ³H-cytidine intake (not shown). 5×10⁶ viable LNC were injected in naive recipient mice i.p. and clinical score was examined for 20 days until the peak of disease in the control group was clearly reached. Mice receiving LNC treated with Smad7-as-ODN did not develop clinical signs of EAE. This suggests that Smad7-as-ODN-treatment can prevent the reactivation of primed autoreactive T cells and block their disease-inducing properties.

FIG. 6.

Smad7-as2-ODN suppresses the proliferation of activated LNC in vitro. PLP-specific LNC were obtained and cultured as described in Materials and Methods over 96 hours and increasing concentrations of Smad7-as2-ODN or Smad7-mut4-as-ODN, respectively. Wells without antisense oligonucleotide or PLP served as controls. The proliferation of LNC is shown as the mean±standard error of quadruplicate cultures. A, Smad7-as2-ODN reduced the proliferation of PLP-restimulated LNC statistically highly significant at concentrations from 20 μM (* p<0.05, ** p<0.005). B, Smad7-mut4-as-ODN had no effect on LNC-proliferation.

FIG. 7.

Smad7-as-ODN diminishes the proliferation of activated LNC in vitro. PLP-specific LNC were obtained and cultured as described in Materials and Methods. LNC were restimulated with 10 μg/ml PLP or 0.2 μg/ml Con A and various concentrations of Smad7-as-ODN over 96 hours. Wells without antisense oligonucleotide or PLP served as controls. The proliferation of LNC is shown as the mean±standard error of quadruplicate cultures. The effect of Smad7-as-ODN was statistically significant at a concentration of 1 μM (p<0.05).

FIG. 8.

Smad7-as-ODN are not toxic against activated LNC. PLP-specific LNC were obtained and cultured as described in Materials and Methods. LNC were restimulated with 10 μg/ml PLP and increasing concentrations of Smad7-as-ODN (initially 8×10⁵ LNC) or Smad7-as2-ODN (initially 4×10⁵ LNC) over 96 hours, respectively. Wells without antisense oligonucleotide served as controls. The viability of LNC is shown as the mean±standard error of triplicate cultures. Cell viability was measured by trypan blue exclusion.

FIG. 9.

Absence of toxicity of Smad7-as2-ODN against activated LNC. PLP-specific LNC were obtained and cultured as described in Materials and Methods. 4×10⁵ LNC were restimulated with 10 μg/ml PLP and increasing concentrations of Smad7-as2-ODN over 96 hours. Wells without antisense oligonucleotide served as controls. Cell viability was measured by propidium iodide staining in Flow-cytometric analysis (2×10⁴ LNC each). The viability of LNC is shown as the mean±standard error of triplicate cultures.

FIG. 10.

Smad7-as-ODN treatment in vivo inhibits the priming of autoreactive T cells. Mice were immunized with 200 μg PLP s.c. as described above. On days 7, 8, and 9 after immunization the mice were treated i.p. with either 100 μg Smad7-as-ODN or Smad7-as2-ODN in PBS, 100 μg of a control random PTO-Oligonucleotide 5′-atg gac aat atg tct a-3′ in PBS, or an equal volume of PBS. Lymph nodes of treated mice were harvested on day 10 and proliferation from LNC cultures was determined as described above. Cells from PBS-treated mice show a strong antigen-specific proliferation in contrast to the blunted proliferative response of cells from mice treated with antisense molecules (FIG. 11). The cells from the mice treated with random-ODN proliferated in culture even without adding peptide antigen.

FIG. 11.

In-vivo MRI 7 days after stroke (90 minutes occlusion of the right middle cerebral artery) in two individual animals treated either with 400 pmol Smad7-as2-ODN antisense oligonucleotides per kg body weight (FIG. 11 a,b) or with the same amount of the respective sense oligonucleotides (FIG. 11 c,d; treatment control). Inversion recovery MRI demonstrate a distinct reduction of infarct volume, especially by preservation of the cerebral cortex, in the Smad7-antisense treated animal. Similar MRI findings were obtained in these animals four weeks after ischemia.

FIG. 12

Smad7-as2-ODN-treatment reduces CNS inflammation. Representative mice from the experiment depicted in FIG. 3 were sacrificed on day 49; paraffin sections of the brain and spinal cord were prepared, stained for H.-E. and evaluated as described in Materials and Methods. (a) PBS-treated animal, EAE-grade 2: axial section of the lumbar part of the spinal cord (obj.-magnification 20×). (b) Smad7-mut4-as-ODN-treated animal, EAE-grade 2.5: longitudinal section of the lower thoracic spinal cord (obj.-magnification 10×). (c) Smad7-as2-ODN-treated animal, EAE-grade 0: axial section of the lumbar spinal cord (obj.-magnification: 5×). In (a) and (b) EAE-typical perivascular infiltrates mainly consisting of lymphocytes and monocytes can be seen; in (c) no inflammation is seen.

FIG. 13

No organ toxicity is detected by histopathological evaluation of Smad7-as2-ODN-treated mice: Selected mice from the experiment depicted in FIG. 3 were sacrificed on day 49; paraffin sections of several organs were prepared, stained and evaluated as described in Materials and Methods. The figure shows representative sections of organs susceptible to TGF-beta-induced toxicity from a Smad7-as2-ODN-treated animal; liver (H.-E., obj.-magnification 40×), spleen (H.-E. (obj.-magnification 10×) and kidney (Masson-Goldner, (obj.-magnification 20×). In particular, no significant increase in connective tissue production was detected. In the kidney, a dilatation of the proximal renal tubules and a widening of the glomerular capsular spaces was observed in mice from all treatment groups and represents a perfusion artefact. In the spleen prominent multinucleated macrophages as typical for EAE-animals were seen in all mice irrespective of treatment. In addition to the organs shown here, skin, lymph node, colon, heart and lung were examined.

FIG. 14

Smad7-as2-ODN diminishes the proliferation of mitogenically activated spleen cells.

Spleen cells were obtained from non-immunized mice and cultured as described in Materials and Methods using 2 μg/ml ConA to polyclonally activate T cells and various concentrations of Smad7-as2-ODN or Smad7-mut4-as-ODN over 96 hours. Wells without antisense-ODN or ConA served as controls. The proliferation of spleen cells is shown as the mean±standard error of quadruplicate cultures.

FIG. 15

Smad7-as2-ODN suppress proliferation of splenic CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells. 10 days after immunization with 200 μg of PLP₁₃₉₋₁₅₁ spleens were dissected and lymphocytes isolated by Ficoll-Paque Plus. CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells were sorted on positive MS-columns using magnetic microbeads coupled to monoclonal antibodies for CD4 or CD8, respectively. The resulting enriched T cell (FIG. 15 a), CD4⁺ (FIG. 15 b) and CD8⁺ T cell (FIG. 15 c) populations were stimulated by plate-bound anti-mouse-CD3-antibodies for 72 hours in the presence of varying concentrations of Smad7-as2-ODN or Smad7-mut4-as-ODN as described in Materials and Methods. Uncoated wells or wells without antisense PTO-ODN, respectively, served as controls. Results are given as arithmetic means±standard error from cultures set up at least in triplicate. A strong suppressive effect of Smad7-as2-ODN on proliferation is seen at concentrations of 10 μM (enriched T cells) or 20 μM (CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell subpopulations was pronounced at concentrations of 20 μM.

FIG. 16

Effects of Smad7 antisense-treatment on T cell proliferation in vitro do not predict efficacy in vivo. PLP-specific LNC were obtained and cultured as described in Materials and Methods over 96 hours and increasing concentrations of Smad7-as2-ODN, Smad7-as3-ODN and Smad7-as4-ODN, respectively. Wells without antisense ODN or PLP served as controls. The proliferation of LNC is shown as the mean±standard error of at least triplicate cultures. All ODN dose-dependently suppressed proliferation (FIG. 16 a). Smad7-as2-ODN and Smad7-as3-ODN were then compared with respect to treatment effect (FIG. 16 b): Naïve mice were injected with 5×10⁶ PLP-specific LNC as described in Materials and Methods. 100 μg (5 mg/kg/d) of Smad7-as2-ODN or Smad7-as3-ODN or Smad7-mut4-as-ODN in PBS or an equal volume of PBS were injected daily from the day of transfer. Smad7-as2-ODN has a stronger beneficial effect on the clinical course than Smad7-as3-ODN while Smad7-mut4-as-ODN rather worsens EAE-signs (FIG. 16 b). In the group treated with Smad7-mut4-as three mice died at early timepoints during the experiment. By convention they were given a grade 5 in the disease severity score until the end of the experiment.

FIG. 17

Smad7-as2-ODN-treatment in vivo inhibits antigenic priming responses. Mice immunized with PLP peptide as described in Materials and Methods were treated with 100 μg (5 mg/kg) of Smad7-as2 or Smad7-mut4-as-ODN or an equal amount of PBS daily i.p. from day 6 to day 9 after immunization. LNC from these groups of mice were restimulated with antigen for 96 hours and used for proliferation assays as described in Materials and Methods. LNC from mice treated with Smad7-as2-ODN during antigenic priming proliferated less vigorously upon specific peptide restimulation as compared to LNC from mice treated with Smad7-mut4-as-ODN. This suggests that a blunted primary immune response is the cause for the reduced LNC encephalitogenicity observed in the experiments of FIG. 18.

FIG. 18

Smad7-as2-ODN-treatment in vivo suppresses the induction of, autoreactive encephalitogenic T cells. Mice immunized with PLP peptide as described in Materials and Methods were treated with 100 μg (5 mg/kg) of Smad7-as2 or Smad7-mut4-as-ODN or an equal amount of PBS daily i.p. from day 6 to day 9 after immunization. LNC from these groups of mice were subsequently restimulated with antigen for 96 hours and used for adoptive transfer (5×10⁸ LNC per recipient mouse) as described in Materials and Methods. Two separate experiments are shown. LNC from mice treated with Smad7-as2-ODN either induced a highly attenuated clinical course (FIG. 18 a, compare number of deaths) or did not induce EAE at all (FIG. 18 b).

FIG. 19

Preventive treatment with Smad7-specific short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) alleviates the clinical signs of at-EAE. 5×10⁶ PLP₁₃₉₋₁₅₁-specific LNC, generated as described in Materials and Methods, were adoptively transferred in naive mice. Recipient mice were treated twice daily with 20 pmol of RNAi1 or RNAi2 or an equal volume of PBS i.p. Mice treated with RNAi1 and RNAi2 show an ameliorated acute disease course as compared to PBS-treated mice.

FIG. 20

Preventive Smad7 antisense-treatment ameliorates the clinical course in a second disease model relevant for multiple sclerosis: MOG-induced EAE in rats. Female DA rats were immunized with 65 μg of recombinant MOG₁₋₁₂₅ in CFA i.c. as described in Materials and Methods. Rats were treated i.p. with 5 mg/kg Smad7-as2-ODN or Smad7-mut4-as-ODN or an equal amount of PBS (250 μl) daily starting on day -2 prior to immunization. The development of clinical signs is delayed in rats treated with Smad7-as2-ODN as compared to rats treated with PBS.

FIG. 21

Local Smad7-as2-ODN-treatment reduces infarct volume as measured by MR volumetry after transient occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in rat. MR infarct volumetry was performed to measure infarct volumes in rats. Occlusion of the middle cerebral artery was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Infusion of the ODN into the internal carotid artery was initiated beginning with reperfusion after 90 min ischemia; rats were treated with 400 pmol Smad7-as2-ODN per kg body weight (n=8) or Smad7-sense-ODN (n=8) as described in Materials and Methods. In vivo infarct-volumetry by MRI was performed 7 days and 3 months after surgery as described in Materials and Methods. At both timepoints the infarct volume in the rats treated with Smad7-as2-ODN as compared to Smad7-sense ODN was significantly reduced (7 days: 1.18±0.26 cm³ vs. 0.49±0.25 cm³ (p<0.001); 3 months: 1.36±0.42 cm³ vs. 0.60±0.28 cm³, (p<0.001 Student t-test)).

FIG. 22

Infarct size as visualized by MRI and by histopathology is considerably reduced by local Smad7-as2-ODN-treatment after transient occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in rat. MR imaging (inversed recovery sequences; coronal and axial orientation) 7 days and 3 months after ischemia and postmortem histology including immunostaining for GFAP (glial fibrillary acid protein) were performed as described in Materials and Methods in two individual rats either treated with Smad7-sense ODN (a,b,e,f,i,j) or Smad7-as ODN (c,d,g,h,k,l), respectively. Parts of this figure correspond to FIG. 11. (FIG. 22 a=11 c; 22 b=11 d; 22 c=11 a; 22 d=11 b).

FIG. 23

SEQ ID NO:1, human Smad7 mRNA

Target sequences of human Smad7-Antisense Oligonucleotides SEQ ID No: 16-29 are underlined,one partially overlapping sequence, corresponding to SEQ ID NO: 21, is shown in italics.

FIG. 24:

SEQ ID NO:2, human Smad7 nucleotide sequence

-   -   CDS 296 . . . 1576     -   /gene=“SMAD7”     -   /codon_(—start=)1     -   /product=“MAD-related gene SMAD7”

FIG. 25:

SEQ ID NO:3, Mouse Smad7 mRNA

Target sequences of mouse Smad7-Antisense Oligonucleotides SEQ ID No: 7-15 are underlined,one partially overlapping sequence, corresponding to SEQ ID NO: 11,is shown in italics.

FIG. 26:

SEQ ID NO:4, mouse Smad7 Amino Acid sequence

-   -   CDS 1437 . . . 2717     -   /gene=“Madh7”     -   /codon_start=1

FIG. 27

SEQ ID NO:5, Rat Smad7 mRNA

Target sequences of rat Smad7-Antisense Oligonucleotides SEQ ID No: 30-38 are underlined,one partially overlapping sequence, corresponding to SEQ ID NO: 34, is shown in italics.

FIG. 28

SEQ ID NO:6, rat Smad7 Amino Acid sequence

-   -   CDS 1422 . . . 2702     -   /gene=“Madh7”     -   /codon_(—start=)1

FIG. 29

Treatment with Smad7-as2-ODN, but not Smad7-mut4-as-ODN, suppresses TGFbeta induced Smad7 mRNA expression in Jurkat T-cells. Jurkat T-Cells were treated with Smad7-as2-ODN, Smad7-mut4-AS-ODN or PBS for 4 hours and then incubated with or without TGFbeta for 30 minutes. Normalized relative amounts of Smad7 mRNA expression were estimated as described in Materials and Methods (Example 19).

The Examples illustrate the invention.

EXAMPLE 1 Methological Part of the Further Examples

Materials and Methods

Animals

Female SJL/J mice were obtained from Harlan Winkelmann (Borchen, Germany) and from Charles River (Sulzfeld, Germany). Mice were 8-20 weeks of age when experiments were started. All procedures were conducted according to protocols approved by the commission of animal protection at the University of Regensburg. Mice were housed in normal cages with free access to food and water; paralyzed mice were afforded easier access to food and water.

Antigens

A serine-substituted peptide 139-151 from proteolipid protein (PLP), PLP₁₃₉₋₁₅₁, was prepared by continuous flow solid phase synthesis according to the sequence for murine PLP (HSLGKVVLGHPDKF SEQ ID NO: 40) by the Institute of Microbiology, University of Regensburg, Germany. Amino acid composition of the peptide was verified by amino acid analysis and purity was confirmed by mass spectroscopy.

Induction of Adoptive Transfer EAE

Each recipient mouse was injected i.v. with 5 to 30×10⁶ activated PLP₁₃₉₋₁₅₁-specific lymph node cells (LNC) as indicated for the individual experiments. Short term PLP₁₃₉₋₁₅₁-specific T-cell lines were generated by immunizing SJL/J mice s.c. at four sites across the flank with 200 μg of PLP₁₃₉₋₁₅₁, emusified 1:1 with CFA containing 800 μg of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich., USA) in a total volume of 200 μl/animal. After ten to eleven days lymph node cells (LNC) derived from draining axillary and inguinal lymph nodes were harvested and cultured with 10 μg/ml of PLP₁₃₉₋₁₅₁ in 24 well plates. The culture medium was based on RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies Inc.), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Biochrom KG, Berlin, Germany), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 5×10⁻⁵ M 2-ME, 1 mM sodium-pyruvate, 12.5 mM HEPES, and 1% non-essential amino acids (all Life Technologies Inc.) according to a protocol previously described [Rajan, 2000]. After 96 hours the LNC were harvested and injected into naive SJL/J recipients.

Clinical Evaluation

Mice were examined daily for signs of disease and graded on a scale of increasing severity from 0 to 5 as follows: 0 no signs; 0.5 partial tail weakness; 1 limp tail or slight slowing of righting from supine position; 1.5 limp tail and slight slowing of righting; 2 partial hindlimb weakness or marked slowing of righting; 2.5 dragging of hindlimb(s) without complete paralysis; 3 complete paralysis of at least one hindlimb; 3.5 hindlimb paralysis and slight weakness of forelimbs; 4 severe forelimb weakness; 5 moribund or dead. Mice reaching a score of 5 were sacrificed. A relapse was defined as a sustained increase of at least one full point for 2 or more days after the animal had improved previously at least one point and had stabilized for at least 2 days. The day of onset of clinical signs, the mean maximal score in each treatment group averaging the maximal score each animal reached at any time and the cumulative scores of all animals of each treatment group over defined periods of time were determined as measurements of disease severity. The number of relapses in a group divided by the number of the mice of that group was determined as the relapse rate.

Antisense PTO-Oligonucleotides and Treatment

The following single-stranded Smad7-antisense phosphorothioate (PTO)-Oligonucleotides (ODN) derived from human Smad-7-mRNA, GenBank AF010193 starting at position 404 from the mRNA-5′end were used: Smad-7-as-ODN, 5′-gtc gcc cct tct ccc ccg cag-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 39), Smad7-antisense2 ODN 5′-gtc gcc, cct tct ccc cgc ag-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 20), and the control Smad7-mut4-antisense ODN 5′-gtc gca ccg tct cac ag cag-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 41) were synthesized by MWG-Biotech (Ebersberg, Germany) and provided in lyophilized form. PTO-ODN were HPSF®-purified. The amino acid composition and purity were confirmed by MALDI-TOF (Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization—Time of Flight)-Mass spectrometry. For the experiments described, the PTO-Oligonucleotides were dissolved in PBS at 0.4 μg/μl and adjusted to neutral pH. In treatment experiments 100 μg Smad7-antisense PTO-Oligonucleotides were injected i.p. daily (5 mg/kg/d), every other day or twice per week as indicated in the experiments. Distribution to treatment groups was performed by randomization. Mice injected with equal amounts of PBS or Smad7-mut4-antisense PTO-Oligonucleotide served as controls.

Transfer of in Vitro PTO-Oligonucleotide-Treated LNC

Mice were immunized with 200 μg PLP s.c. as described above. On day 10 lymph nodes were harvested and LNC cultured with 20 μM of Smad7-antisense PTO-Oligonucleotide and 10 μg/ml PLP as indicated above. After 96 hours the LNC were harvested and injected into naive SJL/J recipients.

In Vitro T-Cell Proliferation Assays

Spleen and draining lymph nodes cells were dissected from animals immunized with 200 μg of PLP₁₃₉₋₁₅₁ emusified in 200 μl CFA containing 250 μg Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra 10-11 days previously. LNC were cultured in 96-well plates (Corning-Costar, Cambridge, Mass., USA) at 4×10⁵ viable cells/well in a total volume of 200 μl RPMI 1640-based medium, as described above. Cells were cultured at 37° C. in 100% humidity and 5% CO₂ in the presence or absence of PLP₁₃₉₋₁₅₁ at a concentration of 10 μg/ml. Concanavalin A (Sigma Chemical Co.) was used at a concentration of 0.2-0.5 μg/ml. To determine the effect of the antisense PTO-Oligonucleotides, varying concentrations were added at a fixed antigenic concentration. Wells without antisense PTO-Oligonucleotides or antigenic peptide, respectively, were used as controls. LNC were pulsed with 1 μCi of ³H-thymidine (NEN Life Science Products, Boston, Mass., USA) after 72 hours, harvested at 96 hours, and ³H-thymidine uptake was detected using a Packard Topcount microplate scintillation counter (Packard instrument Co., Meriden, Conn., USA). Results are given as arithmetic means±standard error from cultures set up at least in triplicate.

Priming Studies

Mice were immunized with 200 μg PLP s.c. as described above. On days 7, 8, and 9 after immunization the mice were treated i.p. with either 100 μg Smad7-as-ODN or Smad7-as2-ODN in PBS, 100 μg of a control random PTO-Oligonucleotide 5′-atg gac aat atg tct a-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 42) in PBS, or an equal~volume of PBS. Lymph nodes of treated mice were harvested on day 10 and proliferation from LNC cultures was determined as described above.

Toxicity Assays and Flow-Cytometric Analysis

PLP₁₃₉₋₁₅₁-primed LNC were derived as described above and cultured with or without 10 μg/ml PLP-peptide in 96-well microtiter plates at 4 or 8×10⁵ viable cells/well in 200 μl RPMI 1640 medium, as described above. Smad7-antisense PTO-Oligonucleotides were added in increasing concentrations. After 96 hours the viability of cells was measured both by trypan blue exclusion and by flow-cytometry using propidium iodide (10⁴ cells/sample) respectively. Data collection and analysis were performed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, N.J., USA). Results are given as arithmetic means±standard error from cultures set up at least in triplicate.

Histology

Selected mice were killed with CO₂. Brain, spinal cord, lymph node, spleen, liver, kidney, colon, heart, lung and skin tissues were fixed in PFA 4%. Paraffin sections (4-6 μm) were made and stained with hematoxylin-eosine, luxol fast blue, and by the Bielschofsky and Masson-Goldner stainings, according to standard protocols. At least 2 coronal sections from three rostro-caudal brain-levels and at least 2 longitudinal and coronal sections from cervical, thoracic and lumbosacral levels of the spinal cord were evaluated in a blinded fashion. To screen for treatment toxicity at least 2 coronal sections from all other tissues were evaluated in in a blinded fashion by an experienced veterinarian.

Statistical Analysis

Differences in clinical scores of mice and cellular proliferation between groups were analyzed by Student's t test for unpaired samples. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. For the plots mean value and standard error of the mean (SE) were calculated.

EXAMPLE 2 Preventive Smad7 Antisense-Treatment Delays Onset and Alleviates Clinical Course in at-EAE

Adoptive-transfer EAE was induced in SJL mice by injection of activated PLP₁₃₉₋₁₅₁-specific LNC. Clinical disease started after 8-15 days, followed by partial recovery and one or more relapses (FIG. 1-4). In three consecutive experiments the effect of Smad7-as PTO-Oligonucleotides (Smad7-as-ODN) in vivo on the development of at-EAE was tested. Following LNC-transfer, mice were initially treated with 100 μg Smad7-as-ODN daily from day 0 (5 mg/kg/d) until the onset of clinical signs in the control group each (FIG. 1). Interestingly, the onset of disease was delayed by almost two weeks (Table 1). Subsequently, although there was no difference in EAE-incidence, maximal score per animal and relapse rate, the clinical course was mitigated, as documented by the cumulative disease scores, in particular during the chronic stage of EAE (days 61-90, Table 1, FIG. 1). TABLE 1 Smad7-as PBS group size n = 7 n = 7 EAE-incidence 7/7 7/7 EAE-prevalence (day 16) 1/7 6/7 EAE-prevalence (day 43) 5/7 7/7 EAE-prevalence (day 90) 1/7 4/7 day of onset (mean ± SE) 27.43 ± 4.28  14.29 ± 1.10  max. score (mean ± SE) 2.86 ± 0.24  3.0 ± 0.59 cumulative score (d 1-30) 101.5 209   cumulative score (d 31-60) 220   307.5 cumulative score (d 61-90) 103.5 300.5 relapse rate (mean ± SE) 0.71 ± 0.33 0.57 ± 0.19 relapse (number/animals) 5/3 4/4

Effects of preventive Smad7-as-ODN treatment on clinical course of EAE (I). Groups of seven mice were treated with 100 μg Smad7-as-ODN (5 mg/kg/d) in PBS or an equal volume of PBS i.p. daily from the day of transfer until the onset of clinical signs in the control group. The clinical course was mitigated by Smad7-as-ODN, as indicated by the EAE-score (see FIG. 1), the cumulative disease scores and the EAE-prevalence on days 16, 43 and 90. There was no difference in EAE-incidence, mean maximal score and relapse rate.

Initiating treatment at the day of transfer but extending the treatment period across the chronic disease stage as indicated in FIG. 2 revealed that the treatment effect is potentially long lasting and may be dependent on the dose or the frequency of application, respectively (FIG. 2, Table 2). Only when the administrations were tapered from initially daily to ultimately twice weekly for the last 6 weeks of observation there appeared to be a slight increase in disease activity (FIG. 2) with the initially diseased mouse having 2 relapses and another one a first exacerbation. Altogether a remarkable reduction in EAE-incidence, mean maximal score, absolute number of relapses (2 vs. 10) and relapse rate (0.33±0.30 vs. 1.67±0.30) was observed (Table 2). TABLE 2 Smad7-as PBS group size n = 6 n = 6 EAE-incidence 2/6 6/6 EAE-prevalence (day 14) 1/6 5/6 EAE-prevalence (day 35) 0/6 2/6 EAE-prevalence (day 60) 2/6 6/6 max. score (mean ± SE) 0.67 ± 0.45 2.42 ± 0.14 relapse rate (mean ± SE) 0.33 ± 0.30 1.67 ± 0.30 relapse (number/animals) 2/1 10/6 

Effects of preventive Smad7-as-ODN treatment on clinical course of EAE (II). Groups of six mice were treated with 100 μg Smad7-as-ODN (5 mg/kg/d) or PBS daily and then tapered to ultimately twice weekly as indicated in FIG. 2. Significant differences between groups were noted for mean maximal score (p=0.015) and relapse rate (p=0.018).

This experiment suggested a treatment regimen of 5 mg/kg three times weekly to be sufficient to obtain long-lasting suppression of clinical signs.

While Smad7-as-ODN contained an extra cytidine between position 124 and 125 of human Smad7-mRNA, the 20mer Smad7-as2-ODN lacks this cytidine. Treatment with the fully complementary Smad7-as2-ODN molecule appeared to be much more effective in later time points compared to Smad7-as-ODN. However, the antisense molecule comprising an additional nucleotide still appeared to be a valuable reagent during earlier time points; see FIG. 3. Yet, the documented Smad7-as2-ODN proved to have a more powerful treatment effect with regard to EAE-incidence, day of onset and mean maximal score than vehicle or Smad7-as-ODN (Table 3). Yet, appended Table 3 clearly documents the powerful effect of mutated as well as “wildtype” antisense molecules. The control PTO-Oligonucleotide Smad7-mut4-as, which is altered in 4 nucleotides compared to Smad7-as2-ODN did not have a protective effect on the development of acute disease (FIG. 3). The administration of 100 μg Smad7-mut4-as daily rather resulted in an earlier, more severe and prolonged first exacerbation compared to the groups receiving Smad7-as2-ODN, Smad7-as-ODN or PBS (Table 3). TABLE 3 Smad7- Smad7- Smad7-mut4- as as2 PBS as group size n = 7 n = 6 n = 6 n = 6 EAE-incidence 6/7 5/6 5/6 5/6 EAE-prevalence (day 12) 5/7 3/6 4/6 5/6 EAE-prevalence (day 30) 6/7 2/6 4/6 5/6 day of onset (mean ± SE) 10.67 ± 0.81  15.80 ± 3.69  10.40 ± 1.66  8.33 ± 1.12 max. score (mean ± SE) 2.36 ± 0.37 1.67 ± 0.35 2.58 ± 0.61 3.25 ± 0.68 deaths 0 0 1 2 *sick animals only

Effects of preventive Smad7-as-ODN treatment on clinical course of EAE (III). Groups of six to seven mice were treated with 100 μg Smad7-as-ODN, Smad7-as2-ODN, the mutated control Smad7-mut4-as-ODN (5 mg/kg/d each) or PBS daily from the day of transfer as shown in FIG. 3. Mean maximal score and EAE-prevalence on days 12 and 30 were remarkably reduced in the Smad7-as2-ODN group. Smad7-as-ODN treatment resulted in a slightly reduced mean maximal score with no EAE-related deaths occurring.

Histology

Brain and spinal cord of representative mice of the experiment depicted in FIG. 3 were evaluated histologically. PBS-treated mice showed typical monocuclar infiltrates in spinal cord and brain. The extent of CNS inflammation correlated with the clinical scores with high scores associated with many dense infiltrates extending from submeningeally deep into the white matter. Smad7-as2-ODN treated mice showed less CNS inflammation than mice treated with Smad7-mut4-as-ODN or PBS.

Smad7as-Treatment at Peak of Disease Alleviates Clinical Course in at-EAE

An additional experiment was performed to examine whether Smad7-antisense ODN administration is therapeutically effective (FIG. 4). Treatment with 100 μg Smad7-as-ODN initiated at the peak of acute disease and administered once daily for 17 days and then every other day for 17 days partially diminished the clinical disease severity. After 18 days of treatment three out of four mice had recovered completely from clinical disease (Table 4). The EAE-score was decreased significantly between days 18-20 (i.e. approximately 1 week after treatment initiation) and days 26-32 post transfer. The better outcome of mice treated with Smad7-as-ODN is confirmed by comparing the cumulative disease scores from days 12-60, i.e. the end of the observation period (Table 4). This documents the therapeutic potential of Smad7-as-PTO-Oligonucleotides for ongoing autoimmune CNS disease. TABLE 4 Smad7-as PBS group size n = 5 n = 5 EAE-incidence 5/5 5/5 EAE-prevalence (day 12) 4/5 3/5 EAE-prevalence (day 30) 1/5 5/5 EAE-prevalence (day 50) 1/5 3/5 cumulative score (d 1-12) 24   24.5 cumulative score (d 12-60) 137.5 239.5 relapse rate (mean ± SE) 0.4 ± 0.22 0.4 ± 0.22 relapse (number/animals) 2/2 2/2

Effects of therapeutic Smad7-as-ODN treatment on clinical course of EAE. Groups of five mice were treated with 100 μg of Smad7-as-ODN or PBS starting at the peak of disease (FIG. 4). After 18 days of treatment 3 out of 4 diseased mice had clinically recovered completely. The cumulative disease score showed a remarkable reduction in the Smad7-as-ODN group.

EXAMPLE 3 Transfer of in Vitro Smad7-Antisense-Treated LNC Fails to Induce at-EAE

It was also investigated wether Smad7-as-ODN-treatment interferes with reactivation of PLP-specific T-cells in vitro and alters the encephalitogenicity of these cells. Therefore freshly isolated LNC from PLP-immunised SJL mice were restimulated with PLP(139-151) for 96 hours adding 20 μM of Smad7-as-ODN. The proliferation of cells cultured in the presence of Smad7-as-ODN was reduced by approximately 30% as compared to the PBS-treated cells (data not shown). While the injection of 5×10⁶ PBS-treated LNC in naive recipients induced typical EAE-signs starting at day 9, the transfer-of-Smad7-as-ODN-treated LNC -failed to induce clinical signs during the observation period of 3 weeks (FIG. 5). This suggests that Smad7-as-ODN-treatment can prevent the reactivation of primed autoreactive T cells and block their disease-inducing properties.

EXAMPLE 4 Smad7-Antisense-Treatment Diminishes the Proliferation of Activated LNC in Vitro

To analyze the potential mechanisms of the treatment effect, we examined the effect of Smad7-as-ODN on antigen-restimulation of PLP-primed LNC in vitro. Coincubation of primed LNC and antigen with Smad7-as2-ODN for 96 hours dose-dependently suppressed proliferation (FIG. 6 a), whereas the presence of Smad7-mut4-as-ODN which has only 80% complementarity to the Smad7 mRNA did not have an effect on LNC-proliferation at all (FIG. 6 b). The reduction of proliferation by Smad7-as2-ODN was statistically highly significant (p<0.005) at concentrations of 20 μM. Smad7-as-ODN also potently inhibited proliferation of PLP-restimulated as well as ConA-stimulated LNC at a concentration as low as 1 μM (FIG. 7). Smad7-as-ODN did not have pro- or antiproliferative effects on resting LNC in low concentrations (FIG. 7).

EXAMPLE 5 Absence of Toxicity of Smad7-Antisense Oligonucleotides Against Activated LNC in Vitro

To exclude a toxic effect of Smad7-as-ODN against LNC as a possible explanation for the highly reduced proliferation rate in vitro toxicity assays with trypane blue staining were performed. Comparing 20 μM Smad7-as-ODN with PBS added to LNC cultures restimulated with peptide, no decrease in the proportion of viable cells was observed. When PLP-primed LNC were restimulated with PLP and coincubated with Smad7-as-ODN in increasing concentrations for 96 hours no significant loss of cell viability was observed in concentrations up to 100 μM (FIGS. 8 and 9). Using Smad7-as2-ODN a reduction of viable cells was only seen at >50 μM (100 μM). This result was confirmed by FACS-analysis and propidium iodide staining. Even at concentrations of 50 μM Smad7-as2-ODN which potently suppress T cell proliferation the viability of the LNC was not significantly affected.

EXAMPLE 6 Long Term Smad7-Antisense-Treatment Leads not to Adverse Side Effects Locally or Systemically

Mice treated with Smad7-as- or Smad7-as2-ODN did not show obvious changes of behavior and did not look different from control mice except for signs produced by EAE itself. Autopsy of the animals immediately after cervical dislocation showed no signs of pathologic changes. Histological evaluation including HE and Masson-Goldner staining gave no hints of increased production of connective tissue in all organs examined (brain, spinal cord, liver, kidney, spleen, lung, heart, skin). A dilatation of the proximal renal tubules and a widening of the glomerular capsular space was observed in kidneys of animals of all treatment groups, including mice treated with PBS. In addition, prominent multinucleated macrophages were detected in spleens, as typical for EAE, with no difference between treatment groups.

EXAMPLE 7 Priming

Treatment with Smad7-as-ODN in vivo inhibits the induction of an autoreactive T cell response. Cells from PBS-treated mice show a strong antigen-specific proliferation in contrast to the blunted proliferative response of cells from mice treated with antisense molecules (FIG. 10). The cells from the mice treated with random-ODN proliferated in culture even without adding peptide antigen.

EXAMPLE 8 Smad7-Antisense-Treatment Attenuates Ischemic Injury in a Model of Focal Cerebral Ischemia (Stroke)

The biological effects of Smad-7-antisense oligonucleotide application were also tested in a rodent model of focal cerebral ischemia. After 90-minutes intraluminal filament occlusion of the right middle cerebral artery in adult rats, either 400 pmol Smad7-as2-ODN (SEQ ID NO: 20) antisense oligonucleotides per kg body weight or the same amount of the respective Smad7-sense oligonucleotide 5′-ctgcggggagaaggggcgac-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 43) as a treatment control, respectively, were infused into the right internal carotid artery continuously during the first 60 minutes of reperfusion. Rats underwent Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) after 7 days and 4 weeks for in-vivo infarct volumetry. Afterwards, animals were sacrificed for histological evaluation of the ischemic brain injury.

Data from a series of experiments showed a reduction of infarct volume in Smad7-antisense-treated rats as compared to controls. The ischemic infarction in Smad7-antisense-treated rats predominantly was restricted to the basal ganglia, whereas, the overlying cerebral cortex was well preserved (FIG. 11). Since this pattern of ischemic lesion is very similar to that observed in recent experiments, using anti-apoptotic compounds, tentative interpretation of these results with Smad7-antisense application in focal cerebral ischemia strongly support the idea that inhibition of Smad7, i.e. reinforcement of the effects of tumor growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), features anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic neuroprotective effects in the ischemic penumbra.

EXAMPLE 9 Methodological Part of the Further Examples Related to EAE Experiments in Mice

Material and Methods are described for the examples 10 to 14 and only if they have not been detailed within example 1. All procedures were conducted according to protocols approved by the commission of animal protection at the University of Regensburg.

Smad7-Antisense-ODN

In addition to Smad7-as2-ODN (SEQ ID NO: 20 ) and Smad7-as-ODN (SEQ ID NO: 39) used in the examples 2-8, Smad7-as3-ODN (SEQ ID NO:21) and Smad7-as4-ODN (SEQ ID NO: 9) were used for treatment experiments and/or T cell proliferation assays.

T Cell Proliferation Assays:

Spleens were dissected and lymphocytes isolated by Ficoll-Paque Plus (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden). CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells were positively selected on MS-columns using magnetic microbeads coupled to anti-mouse-CD4 or anti-mouse- CD8, respectively (all Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). The resulting enriched T cells (FIG. 17 a), CD4⁺ (FIG. 17 b) and CD8⁺ T cell (FIG. 17 c) populations were stimulated on microtiter plates coated with anti-mouse-CD3-antibodies (Becton Dickinson, Two Oak Park, Bedford Mass., USA) for 72 hours in the presence of varying concentrations of Smad7-as2-ODN or Smad7-mut4-as-ODN as described in Materials and Methods. Uncoated wells or wells without antisense PTO-ODN, respectively, served as controls. Proliferation was measured by ³H-thymidine uptake as described above. Results are given as arithmetic means±standard error from cultures set up at least in triplicate.

Priming Studies

The priming studies described in FIGS. 18 and 19 and example 17, respectively, were performed similarly to those described in FIG. 10/example 7. Treatment of immunized mice was performed between days 6 to 9 post immunization with 100 μg Smad7-as2-ODN or Smad7-mut4-as ODN or an equal amount of PBS, respectively. Mice were immunized with 200 μg PLP s.c. as described above. LNC cultures, adoptive transfer and proliferation assays were performed as described above.

Treatment with Smad7-Specific Short Interfering RNAs (siRNAs)

The following Smad7 (AF015260) RNA oligonucleotides were used: (SEQ ID NO: 44) RNAi1: nt 3-23 5′-GUUCAGGACCAAACGAUCUGC-3′, (SEQ ID NO: 45) nt 23-1 5′-GCAGAUCGUUUGGUCCUGAACAU-3′. (SEQ ID NO: 46) RNAi2: nt 283-303 5′-CUCACGCACUCGGUGCUCAAG-3′, (SEQ ID NO: 47) nt. 303-281 5′-CUUGAGCACCGAGUGCGUGAGCG-3′.

The RNA oligonucleotides were chemically synthesized on an Applied. Biosystems Synthesizer (Expedite 8909) using standard protocols by Ribopharma AG, Kulmbach. For annealing of siRNAs, 20 ρM single strands were incubated in annealing buffer for 1 min at 90° C. followed by 1 h at 37° C. (Elbashir, 2001a, Elbashir, 2001b). Starting with the day of transfer EAE-induced SJL mice were injected twice daily i.p. with 20 pmol annealed RNAi molecules solubilized in PBS (100 pmol/ml, pH 7.4).

EXAMPLE 10 Histopathology of Preventive Smad7 Antisense-Treatment in Vivo

The histopathology of Smad7 antisense-treatment as seen in FIG. 13 in vivo is already described in example 2. The histopathological evaluation of organs outside of the CNS, as seen in FIG. 14, is described in example. 6. The figures illustrate that treatment with Smad7-as2-ODN suppresses inflammation within the CNS without inducing side-effects in non-CNS organs known to be affected by systemic administration of active TGF-beta.

EXAMPLE 11 Smad7 Antisense-Treatment Suppresses the Proliferation of Polyclonally Activated T Cells in Vitro

This example provides evidence that antisense ODN specific for Smad7 dose-dependently inhibit the proliferative response associated with T cell activation mediated by the lectin Con A and plate-bound anti-CD3-antibodies.

In the first experiment whole spleen cell populations were stimulated over 96 hours with the lectin Con A (mediating polyclonal T cell activation) in the presence of varying concentrations of Smad7-as2-ODN (SEQ ID NO: 20) or Smad7-mut4-as-ODN (FIG. 14). Only Smad7-as2-ODN (SEQ ID NO: 20) significantly reduced proliferation. In the second experiment plate-bound anti-CD3 antibodies were used to stimulate T cells enriched over Ficoll, confirming this result (FIG. 15 a). To determine whether this effect is limited to CD4+ or CD8+-T cells the respective subpopulations were isolated and stimulated with anti-CD3; the antiproliferative effect of Smad7-as2-ODN extends to both CD4+ or CD8+-T cells (FIGS. 15 b and 15 c).

EXAMPLE 12 Effects of Smad7 Antisense-Treatment in Vivo

To screen for further Smad7-specific antisense ODN potentially effective for treatment of autoimmune disease, Smad7-as3-ODN (SEQ ID NO: 21) and Smad7-as4-ODN (SEQ ID NO: 9) were tested in parallel with Smad7-as2-ODN (SEQ ID NO: 20) for their effect on PLP₁₃₉₋₁₅₁-specific LNC proliferation (FIG. 16 a). All ODN tested dose-dependently suppressed proliferation, albeit with some variability between experiments (compare the effect of Smad7-as2-ODN in FIGS. 6, 14, 15, 16). Smad7-as3-ODN was somewhat less effective than Smad7-as2-ODN in preventing the development of EAE-signs when administered i.p. at a dose of 5 mg/kg daily from the day of adoptive transfer as described in Materials and Methods (FIG. 16 b, table 5). This example supplements the results from example 2 (table 3) and example 4 in showing that various ODN specific for Smad7 suppress proliferation of T cells to a similar extent while the treatment effect on adoptive transfer EAE varies between ODN of different sequence. TABLE 5 Smad7- Smad7-as2 Smad7-as3 mut4-as PBS group size n = 7 n = 7 n = 7 n = 7 EAE-incidence 7/7 7/7 7/7 7/7 EAE- 2/7 3/7 7/7 7/7 prevalence (day 11) day of onset 12.86 ± 0.84  11.86 ± 0.91  9.29 ± 0.60 9.29 ± (mean ± SE) 0.30 max. score 2.36 ± 0.17  2.5 ± 0.17 3.93 ± 0.36 2.71 ± (mean ± SE) 0.14 cumulative 167.0 234.0 467.5 280.0 score (d 1-28) deaths 0 0 3 0 (d7, 9, 11)

Effects of preventive treatment with various Smad7-antisense-ODN. In the group treated with Smad7-mut4-as (an antisense molecule which is not capable of specifically interacting with or hybridizing to a Smad7 expression product (mRNA) or specifically interacting with/hybridizing to one or more nucleic acid molecules encoding Smad7) three mice died at early timepoints during the experiment. By convention they were given a grade 5 in the disease severity score until the end of the experiment.

EXAMPLE 13 Smad7 Antisense-Treatment Suppresses in Vivo Priming Responses

This examples add to data from example 7 in demonstrating that in vivo antigenic priming responses of autoreactive T cells are blunted during Smad7-as2-ODN-treatment and result in T cells of reduced encephalitogenicity.

Mice immunized with PLP peptide were treated with 100 μg (5 mg/kg) of Smad7-as2 or Smad7-mut4-as-ODN or an equal amount of PBS daily i.p. from day 6 to day 9 after immunization. LNC from these groups of mice were subsequently restimulated with antigen for 96 hours and used for proliferation assays (FIG. 17) and EAE-induction by adoptive transfer (5×10⁶ LNC per recipient mouse) (FIG. 18).

LNC from mice treated with Smad7-as2-ODN during antigenic priming proliferate less vigorously upon specific peptide restimulation as compared to LNC from untreated mice or from mice treated with Smad7-mut4-as-ODN (FIG. 17).

In FIG. 18, two separate experiments are shown. In contrast to LNC derived from mice treated with Smad7-mut4-as-ODN or PBS, LNC from mice treated with Smad7-as2-ODN either induced a highly attenuated clinical course (FIG. 18 a, compare number of deaths) or did not induce EAE at all (FIG. 18 b). The in vitro results from FIGS. 10 (example 7) and 17 suggest that this is due to partial inhibition of primary immune responses in Smad7-antisense-ODN-treated mice with the consequence that, upon antigenic stimulation, the disease-inducing capacity of the resulting T cells is considerably compromised.

EXAMPLE 14 Preventive Treatment with Smad7-Specific Short Interfering RNAs (siRNAs) Alleviates the Clinical Course in at-EAE

The efficacy of Smad7-antisense-ODN treatment suggests that approaches targeting Smad7 mRNA or Smad7 protein, resulting in a reduction of mRNA and/or protein or their functional inhibition may be similarly effective for the in vivo treatment of disease. Therefore Smad7-specific short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were synthesized and used for the treatment of adoptive transfer EAE (FIG. 19, table 6). Preventive treatment with two of these Smad7-specific siRNAs (RNAi1, RNAi2) resulted in an amelioration of clinical signs of EAE during the acute phase of the disease as compared to PBS-treated mice. TABLE 6 Smad7- RNAi1 Smad7-RNAi2 PBS group size n = 7 n = 7 n = 7 EAE-incidence 7/7 7/7 7/7 EAE-prevalence (day 11) 4/7 5/7 7/7 day of onset (mean ± SE) 11.29 ± 0.94  11.14 ± 0.87  9.29 ± 0.30 max. score (mean ± SE) 2.36 ± 0.19 2.5 ± 0.2 2.71 ± 0.14 cumulative score 241.5 244.5 314.5 (d 1-31) Deaths 0 0 0

Preventive treatment with Smad7-specific short interfering RNAs (siRNAs).

EXAMPLE 15 Methodological Part of the Examples Related to EAE Experiments in Rats

Animals:

Female Dark Agouti-rats (DA-rats) were obtained from Harlan Winkelmann (Borchen, Germany). Rats were 13 weeks old when used for immunization procedures. Rats were housed in normal cages with free access to food and water; paralyzed rats were afforded easier access to food and water.

Antigens:

The N-terminal fragment of rat myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) containing the amino acids 1-125 (cDNA obtained as a kind gift from C. Linington, Munich) were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified to homiogeneity by chelate chromatography as described by Amor (Amor, 1994). The amino acid sequence of recombinant ratMOG protein (AA 1-125) depicted in SEQ ID NO: 84 further comprises a 6×His peptide tag introduced for the ease of purification. The purified protein in 6M urea was dialyzed against PBS and the preparations obtained were stored at −20° C. For simplicity this MOG-fragment used is named “MOG” in the remainder of this application.

Induction, Treatment and Evaluation of MOG-Induced EAE:

An emulsion was prepared containing 65 μg MOG in PBS and an equal volume of incomplete Freund's adjuvant supplemented with 400 μg of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (H37RA, see example 1) in an inoculation volume of 200 μl per immunized rat. Immunizations were performed in anesthetized rats intradermally at the base of the tail.

Treatment with Smad7-as2-ODN or Smad7-mut4-as-ODN or an equal amount of PBS was performed as indicated in the examples I and 9. Rats were examined daily for signs of disease and graded on a scale of increasing severity from 0 to 5 as follows: 0 no signs; 0.5 partial tail weakness; 1 limp tail; 2 partial hindlimb weakness or hemiparesis; 3 complete paralysis of at least one hindlimb; 4 severe forelimb weakness; 5 moribund or dead.

EXAMPLE 16 Preventive Smad7 Antisense-Treatment Ameliorates the Clinical Course of Active MOG-Induced EAE in Rats

Adoptive transfer EAE in SJL-mice is a model for the human autoimmune CNS disease multiple sclerosis. The treatment results as demonstrated in the previous examples therefore suggest that treatments functionally inhibiting Smad7 mRNA and/or protein such as Smad7-specific antisense ODN represent a promising approach to treat multiple sclerosis or related autoimmune inflammatory diseases of the CNS. To verify this hypothesis a second disease model relevant for multiple sclerosis was chosen. This model, EAE induced by immunization with the N-terminal fragment of MOG differs significantly from the adoptive transfer model. With the presence of significant demyelination and the putative contribution of antibodies during lesion pathogenesis it probably even more closely represents the human disease than murine EAE (Storch, 1998). Interestingly preventive Smad7 antisense-treatment ameliorated the clinical course of MOG-induced EAE in rats treated i.p. with 5 mg/kg Smad7-as2-ODN. The development of clinical signs was delayed as compared to rats treated with PBS (FIG. 20, table 7). TABLE 7 Smad7- Smad7-mut4- as2 as PBS group size n = 8 n = 8 n = 8 EAE-incidence 5/8 6/8 6/8 EAE-prevalence 1/8 6/8 6/8 (day 14) EAE-prevalence 3/8 4/8 6/8 (day 17) day of onset 15.20 ± 1.66  10.20 ± 1.42  11.50 ± 0.61  (mean ± SE)* max. score 1.44 ± 0.49 1.69 ± 0.54 2.25 ± 0.62 (mean ± SE) cumulative score 23.5 57.0 80.5 (d 1-17) *sick animals only Treatment of MOG-induced active EAE

EXAMPLE 17 Methodological Part of the Examples Related to Experimental Stroke

The following experiments conformed with the guidelines of the German law governing animal care. Animal protocols were approved by the Animal Care Committee of the Bavarian government and the local ethics committee.

Animals

Adult male Wistar rats (body weight 250-270 g) were supplied by Charles River (Sulzfeld, GermanyF) and were maintained with food and water ad libitum at 23° C. and 50% relative humidity for at least 5 days prior to surgery.

Surgery and Induction of Focal Cerebral Ischemia

Anesthesia was induced with 4% isoflurane inhalation and then maintained with 1.5% isoflurane in a gas mixture of 70% nitrogen and 30% oxygen after endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation by a pressure-controlled small animal respirator. Rectal temperature was monitored continuously throughout the experiment and was maintained at 37.0° C. by use of a thermostatically feed-back-regulated heating lamp and stage. After cannulation of the tail artery providing monitoring of blood pressure and blood gases, rats were placed in a stereotactic frame. The skull was exposed by a midline incision and two burr holes measuring 2 mm in diameter were drilled for bilateral monitoring of local cortical blood flow (ICBF). Both MCA supply territories were continuously monitored by laser doppler flowmetry (MBF3D, Moor Instruments, U.K.), and cortical EEG was recorded on both sides. After a midline incision of the neck had been carried out, the right carotid bifurcation was exposed and the extracranial branches of the internal carotid artery (ICA) were ligated and electrocoagulated, assisted by an operating microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, GermanyF). Subsequently, the external carotid artery (ECA) was ligated and cut distally to the superior thyreoid artery, after the common carotid artery had been occluded by a microclip (Biemer FD 68, Tuttlingen, GermanyF). Then, a silicone-coated 4-0 nylon monofilament (Ethicon) was introduced in the ECA and gently advanced through the ICA until its tip occluded the origin of the right MCA (Schmid-Elsaesser et al. 1998). As a result, ICBF in the right MCA territory dropped down to approximately 20% of baseline values. The endovascular filament remained in place until reperfusion was enabled through withdrawal of the filament and removal of the microclip at the common carotid artery after 90 minutes of ischemia. Two sham-operated rats were processed identically including ligation and cutting of the external carotid artery except for intraluminal filament occlusion of the MCA. Physiological variables including arterial blood pressure, heart rate, arterial blood gases (pO₂, pCO₂, pH, base excess, O₂ saturation), plasma glucose, and hematocrit were recorded 15 min prior to surgery and subsequently every 15 min throughout the experiment until the animals were replaced to their cages.

Local Intra-Arterial Administration of Specific Antisense ODN

The following single-stranded phosphorothioate PTO-ODN were used: Smad7-as2-ODN (Seq ID NO: 10) and Smad7-sense-ODN (SEQ ID NO: 43). Infusion of ODN beginning with reperfusion after 90 min ischemia was performed through a PE-catheter introduced via the external carotid artery into the internal carotid artery and gently pushed forward until its tip was located directly at the beginning of the carotid channel. Rats either were treated with 400 pmol Smad7-as2-ODN per kg body weight dissolved in 0.9% NaCl at pH 7.4 (100 pmol/0.5 ml over 1 hr; treatment, n=8) or with 400 pmol Smad7-sense-ODN per kg body weight dissolved in 0.9% NaCl at pH 7.4 (100 pmol/0.5 ml over 1 hr; control, n=8).

Immediately after infusion, the catheter was removed, followed by ligation of the external carotid artery stump and closure of the wound by suture. After withdrawal of volative anesthetics and restitution of sponteaneous respiration, the animals were extubated and monitored continuously regarding vital signs, body temperature, and neurological performance, before being replaced to their cages.

Clinical Evaluation

Neurological deficits were scored according to Bederson et al. (1986): 0, asymptomatic; 1, failure to extend the contralateral forepaw (mild); 2, circling to the contralateral side (moderate); and 3, loss of walking or righting reflex (severe). Only animals with a neurological deficit score of 2 or higher when extubated and alert were included into the subsequent steps of the protocol.

Infarct Volume Measurement by in-Vivo MRI

Seven days and three months after ischemia, rats were reanesthetized for quantification of the ischemic lesion by in vivo MRI. Measurements were performed on a 1.5 T MR scanner (Siemens Magnetom Vision, Erlangen, Germany) similar to the approach described by (Guzman, 2000). The head of the rat was positioned into the bore of a small surface coil (ID 5 cm) acting as a volume coil. Two types of sequences were used for scanning the rat brain: a T₂-weighted TSE sequence T₂: TR 2500, TE 96, ETL 7, TA 6:04, Acq 8, SL 2 mm, Gap 0, Ma 128×256, 4/8 RecFOV, FOV 84 mm) and a heavily Ti-weighted inversion recovery sequence (IR: TR 3000, TE 60, TI 150, ETL 11, TA 5:33, Acq 10, SL 1.5 mm, Gap 0, Ma 121×256, 4/8 RecFOV, FOV 109 mm). Scanning included axial and coronal series of both sequence types T₂, IR). A complete study following this protocol durated for approximately 45 min total measuring time.

Quantitative morphometrical evaluation of the infarcted area in each MRI slice was performed by an experienced neuroradiologist who was blinded to the experimental data, using a semi-automatic image analysis software (Image Analysis, NIH, Bethesda, Md., U.S.A.) on a Macintosh G3 computer. Since the inversion recovery sequences allow the differentiation of infarcted tissue from vital brain tissue most clearly, IR sequences (axial and coronal sections) were used for infarct volumetry. Basically, infarct volumes were calculated in cm³ by calculating the sum of the areas of infarcted tissue of each plane, multiplied by the slice thickness.

Histology

Infarct volumes were also assessed semiquantitatively by histological evaluation. Subsequent to the second MRI at three months survival after MCA occlusion rats were sacrificed in deep anesthesia. After decapitation and cryoflxation, brains were entirely cut into 40 μm coronal sections. Representative sections of the MCA territory were mounted and stained with cresyl violet (Nissl stain) or immunostained to glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP; donkey-anti-rabbit IgG 1:1000; DAB-detected) for assessment of the ischemic lesion by light microscopy.

Statistical Analysis

A comparison between groups (Smad7-as2-ODN, Smad7-sense-ODN) was made by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post hoc Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons. Calculations were performed by use of a software package (SigmaStat) on an IBM computer.

EXAMPLE 18 Local Smad7-Antisense-ODN Treatment Results in Reduced Infarct Volume on Day 7 and 3 Months After Focal Cerebral Ischemia

In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Lesion sizes as measured by MRI infarct volumetry at day 7 (3 months) for rats treated by Smad7-sense-ODN or Smad7-as2-ODN were 1.32±0.33 cm³ (1.55±0.35 cm³) vs. 0.49×0.25 cm³ (0.60×0.28 cm³), respectively. Accordingly, the degree of neuroprotection in Smad7-as2 treated rats compared with control was 58.47% at day 7 and 55.88% at three months after ischemia (p<0.001). Thus, Smad7-as treatment was associated with a dramatic reduction of the ischemic injury in both the acute and the chronic stage of focal cerebral ischemia (FIG. 21).

Sequential in-vivo MRI findings from two representative animals either treated with Smad7-sense-ODN or Smad7-as2-ODN are illustrated in FIG. 22 a-h. There was a close correlation between the extent of ischemic injury as demonstrated by the follow-up MRI and the histological appearance of the lesion. Strikingly, both basal ganglia and cerebral cortex were significantly more affected in Smad7-sense treated rats than in the Smad7-as2-ODN-treated group.

Histology

Semiquantitative histological assessment of the ischemic injury on specimen stained with cresyl violet or immunostained for the astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) confirmed the in-vivo MRI findings. Total infarct volumes were considerably smaller in Smad7-as2-ODN-treated rats as compared to rats treated with Smad7-sense-ODN. The protective effect of Smad7-as2-ODN included cerebral cortex and subcortical white matter, and basal ganglia (FIG. 22 i-l). At the light microscopic level there was pronounced gliosis covering the lesion in specimen of both treatment groups, but no evidence for persisting inflammation at 3 months after stroke.

These data therefore indicate that local treatment with Smad7-specific antisense-ODN mediates significant neuroprotection and reduces infarct volumes after focal cerebral ischemia. This protection is already seen after administration of a single dose of antisense-ODN.

EXAMPLE 19

Jurkat T-cells (ECACC N° 88042803) were grown in RPMI medium with 10% FCS, Penicillin 1U/mi, Streptomicin 10 μg/ml and Glutamine 20 mM. Before treatment, cells were changed to starvation medium without FCS. After 3 days cells were counted using the Neubauer chamber and plated in 24 well plates at 2×10⁶ cells/well, and then treated with Smad7-as2-ODN (10 μM), Smad7-mut4-AS-ODN (10 μM) or PBS for 4 hours. Then cells were incubated with or without TGFbeta (5 ng/μl) for 30 minutes. The cells were centrifugated, washed, and the amount of 1×10⁷ cells was lysed with 600 μl RLT buffer according to the QIAGEN RNeasy mini (Catalog N° 74104) protocol. 90 ng total RNA was used for the one step RT PCR, using QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Kit from QIAGEN (Catalog N° 204143) using Smad 7 primers and as standard the rRNA primer pair QuantumRNA Classic 18S from Ambion (Catalog N° 1716). Smad7 primers were sense: 5′-ATG TTC AGG ACC AAA CGA TCT GCG-3′ and antisense: 5′-AGC TGC CGC TCC TTC AGT TTC TT-3′. For amplification, the RotorGene Real Time PCR System (Corbett Research) was used, with the one step temperature profile: reverse transcriptase temperature 50°, 30 minutes;-activation of..polymerase, 95°, 1.5 minutes; 45 cycles of: denaturating temperature 94°, 20 secs, annealing temperature 59°, 30 secs, elongation temperature 72°, 120 secs. Fluorescense messure was done after each cycle. At the end, a melting curve (80°-950), hold 10 secs and messure of fluorescense was done to verify amplification of the expected PCR product. To measure the concentration of the produced DNA, we used a standard curve produced by amplification of given amounts of a Smad7 plasmid produced by cloning of the complete coding region of the human Smad7 mRNA into the pCR′4 Blunt TOPO cloning vector from Invitrogen (Catalog N° K2875-J10). To estimate the concentration of rRNA we used the standard RNA delivered with the primers (Qiagen).

References

-   Agrawal S (1998) Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 8, 135-139 -   Ali D (2001) J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 21, 820-827. -   Amor S 1994 J. Immunol. 153, 4349-4356. -   An H (2001) J Org Chem, 66, 2789-2801. -   Ata A K 1997 Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 93, 326-33. -   Baker J C (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 1880-1889. -   Beck J (1991) Acta Neurol Scand, 84, 452-455. -   Benveniste E N 1998 Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 9, 259-75. -   Bitzer M (1998) Kidney Blood Press Res, 21, 1-12. -   Bitzer M (2000) Genes Dev. 14,187-197. -   Blind M (1999). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96, 3606-3610. -   Blobe G C (2000) N Engl J Med 342, 1350-1358. -   Border W A (1994) N Engl J Med 331, 1286-1292. -   Brocke S (1996) Methods 9, 458-462. -   Brummelkamp T R (2002) Science 296, 550-553 -   Buisson A 1998 Faseb J 12, 1683-91. -   Calabresi P A (1998) Neurology 51, 289-92. -   Chalaux E 1999 FEBS Lett 457, 478-82. -   Chen Y (1996 Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 388-391. -   Chen L Z (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 12516-12521. -   Chen W (2001) J Exp Med 194, 439-453. -   Chen Y (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 93, 388-391. -   Choi D W 1996 Curr Opin Neurobiol 6, 667-72. -   Croxford J L (1998) J Immunol, 160, 5181-5187. -   Datta P K (2000) Mol Cell Biol 20, 3157-3167. -   De Groot C J (1999) J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 58, 174-187. -   De Jong E S (2002) Curr Trop Med Chem 2, 289-302 -   Derynck R (1986) J Biol Chem 261, 4377-4379. -   Derynck R (1987) Nucleic Acids Res 15, 3188-3189. -   De Oliveira M C (2000) Life Sci 67, 1625-1637. -   Diab A (1998) J Neuroimmunol 85, 146-154. -   Dixon C E 1991 J Neurosci Methods 39, 253-62. -   Donze O (2002) Nucleic Acids Res 30, e46. -   Dorner (1996) Bioorg Med Chem 4, 709-715. -   Ebisawa T (2001). J Biol Chem 276, 12477-12480. -   Elbashi S M (2002), Methods 26:199-213. -   Elbashir S M (2001a) Nature 411, 494-498. -   Elbashir S M (2001b) Genes Dev. 15, 188-200. -   Faden A I 1993 Crit Rev Neurobiol 7, 175-86. -   Famulok M (1998) Curr Opin Chem Biol 2, 320-327 -   Ferrigno O 2002 Oncogene 21, 4879-84. -   Fiocchi C (1998) Gastroenterology 115, 182-205. -   Francis G (1997) Ann Neurol 42, 467 -   Friedman S L (1993) N Engl J Med 328, 1828-1835. -   Garside P (2001) Semin Immunol 13, 177-185 -   Gayo A (2000) J Neurol Sci 179, 43-49. -   Gold L (1995) Annu Rev Biochem 64, 763-797. -   Gonnella P A (1998) J Immunol 160, 4708-4718 -   Grishok A (2001) Cel. 106, 23-34. -   Gross C E 1993 Stroke 24, 558-62. -   Gross C E (1994) Neurol Res. 16:465-470. -   Guzman R 2000 J Neurosci Methods 97, 77-85. -   Hammond S M (2001) Science 293, 1146-1150. -   Hailer N P (2001) Eur J Neurosci 14, 315-326. -   Han J (1994). Antisense Res Dev 4, 53-65. -   Hayashi H (1997) Cell 89, 1165-1173. -   Hefferan T E 2000 J Biol Chem 275, 20255-9. -   Henrich-Noack P 1996 Stroke 27, 1609-14; discussion 1615. -   Hermann T (2000) Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 39, 1890-1904. -   Hoffman L M (1998) Res. Immunol 149, 790-794. -   Hughes D (1980) Clin Exp Immunol, 40, 523-531. -   Hutvagner G (2001) Science 293, 834-838. -   Imamura T (1997) Nature 389, 622-626. -   Inoue H (1998) Mol Biol Cell 9, 2145-2156. -   Ishisaki (1999) J Biol Chem 274, 13637-13642. -   Issazadeh S (1998) J Immunol. 161, 1104-1112. -   Issazadeh S (1995) J Neuroimmunol. 61, 205-212. -   Itoh F (2001) EMBO J 15, 4132-4142. -   Itoh S (2000) Eur J Biochem 267, 6954-6967. -   Itoh S (1998) J Biol Chem. 273, 29195-29201. -   Johns L D (1991) J. Immunol 147, 1792-1796. -   Johns L D (1993) J Neuroimmunol 1993; 47, 1-7. -   Johnsen S A 2002a Oncogene 21, 5783-90. -   Johnsen S A 2002b J Cell Biochem 87, 233-41. -   Johnsen S A 2002c J Biol Chem 277, 30754-9. -   Kanamaru C (2001) J Biol Chem 276, 45636-45641 -   Kandimalla E (1994) Gene 149, 115-121. -   Karpus W J (1999) J Neurovirol 5, 1-2. -   Kasus-Jacobi A (2000) Oncogene. 19, 2052-2059. -   Kavsak P (2000) Mol Cell 6, 1365-1375. -   Khanna A K (1999) Transplantation 67, 882-889. -   Khoury S J (1992) J Exp Med. 176, 1355-1364. -   Kiefer R (1998) J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 57, 385-395. -   Kim J S 1996 Stroke 27, 1553-7. -   Kriegistein K 1998 J Neurosci 18, 9822-34. -   Krupinski J 1996 Stroke 27, 852-7. -   Kulkarni A B 1993 Am J Pathol 143, 3-9. -   Kulkarni A B (1993) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 90, 770-774. -   Kuruvilla A P (1991) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88, 2918-2921. -   Lagna G (1996) Nature 383, 832-836 -   Leaman D W (1999) Meth Enzymol 18, 252-265. -   Lehrmann E 1998 Glia 24, 437-48. -   Lehrmann E 1995 Exp Neurol 131, 114-23. -   Letterio J J (2000) Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 11, 81-87. -   Letterio J L (1998) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16, 137-161. -   Li J H 2002 J Am Soc Nephrol 13, 1464-72. -   Liblau R S (1995) Immunol. Today 16, 34-38. -   Lindholm D 1992 J Cell Biol 117, 395-400. -   Liu F (1996). Nature 381, 620-623. -   Logan A 1994 Eur J Neurosci 6, 355-63. -   Logan A 1992 Brain Res 587, 216-25. -   Martin R (1992) Annu. Rev. Immunol 10, 153-187. -   Massague J (1987) Cell 49, 437-438. -   Mathisen P M (1997) J Exp Med 186, 159-164. -   Mattson M P 1997 Brain Res Brain Res Rev 23, 47-61. -   Mayer G (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 4961-4965. -   McNeill H 1994 Neuroreport 5, 901-4. -   Miller A (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 89, 421-425. -   Miller S D (1994) Immunol Today 15, 356-361. -   Miyazono K (2001) J Cell Physiol 187, 265-276. -   Mokhtarian F (1994) J Immunol 152, 6003-10. -   Monteleone G (2001) J Clin Invest 108, 601-609. -   Monroe R J (1999) Immunity 11, 201-212. -   Morganti-Kossmann M C (1999) J Neurotrauma. 16, 617-622. -   Nagarajan R P (1999) J Biol Chem 274, 33412-33418. -   Nakao A (2000) J Exp Med 192, 151-158. -   Nicholson L B (1995) Immunity 3, 397-405. -   O'Garra A (1997) Curr Opin Immunol 9, 872-883. -   Okuda Y (1995) J Neuroimmunol 62, 103-112. -   Ostresh J M (1996) Methods Enzymol. 267, 220-324. -   Ostendorf T (2001) J Am Soc Nephrol. 12, 909-918. -   Pabo C O (1996) Bioorg Med Chem. 4, 1545-1558. -   Pang L 2001 Stroke 32, 544-52. -   Panitch H (1997) Ann Neurol 42, 459-463. -   Peterziel H 2002 J Cell Biol. 159, 157-167 -   Prakash T P (2001) Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids, 20,     829-832. -   Pratt B M 1997 Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 8, 267-92. -   Prehn J H 1993 J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 13, 521-5. -   Pulaski L (2001) J Biol Chem 276, 14344-14349. -   Racke M K (1994) J Exp Med 180, 1961-1966. -   Racke M K (1991) J. Immunol., 146, 3012-3017. -   Racke M K (1992). Int Immunol 4, 615-620. -   Racke M K (1993) J Neuroimmunol 46, 175-183. -   Raine C S (1995) Nature Medicine 1, 211-214. -   Ribeiro A 1999 Hepatology 30, 1490-7. -   Rimaniol A C 1995 Neuroreport 7, 133-6. -   Rose R B (1996) Biochemistry 35, 12933-12944 -   Ruocco A (1999) J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 19, 1345-1353 -   Sandrock B (2001) J Biol Chem 276, 35328-35333. -   Santambrogio L (1993) J. Immunol 151, 1116-1127. -   Santambrogio L (1998) J Neuroimmunol 81, 1-13. -   Samani T D (2001) Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev, 11, 129-136. -   Schwope I (1999) J Org Chem, 64:4749-4761. -   Semple S C (2001) Biochim Biophys Acta, 10, 152-166. -   Sharma K (2000) Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 11, 115-23. -   Slevin M (2000) Stroke 31, 1863-1870. -   Smith L (2000) Eur J Pharmacol Sci 11, 191-198. -   Souchelnytskyi S (1998) J Biol Chem. 273, 25364-25370. -   Sporn M B (1989) Jama 262, 938-941. -   Sporn M B (1987). J Cell Biol 105, 1039-45. -   Stanzani L 2001 Cerebrovasc Dis 12, 240-4. -   Steinman L (1997) J Exp Med 185, 2039-2041. -   Storch M K 1998 Brain Pathol 8, 681-94. -   Subramaniam M 1995 Nucleic Acids Res 23, 4907-12. -   Subramaniam M 1998 J Cell Biochem 68, 226-36. -   Suchanek E G (1986) Biochemistry 25, 5987-5991. -   Sudol M 1994 Oncogene 9, 2145-52. -   Sullivan P 2002 Brain Res 949, 88-96. -   Sun S (2000) Curr Opin Mol Ther 2, 100-105. -   Suzuki C 2002 J Biol Chem. 29, 1621-1625 -   Tachibana I 1997 J Clin Invest 99, 2365-74. -   Tanaka M (1999) J Neurobiol 41, 524-539. -   Tanuma N (2000) J Neuroimmunol 108, 171-180. -   Teillaud J L (1999) Pathol Biol 47, 771-775. -   Terrell T G (1993) Int Rev Exp Pathol 34 Pt B, 43-67. -   Thorbecke G J (2000) Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 11, 89-96. -   Tsukazaki T (1998) Cell 95:779-791. -   Ulloa L (1999) Nature 397, 710-713. -   Verschueren K (2000) J Biol Chem 275, 11320-11326. -   Vorobjev P E (2001) Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev, 11, 77-85. -   Walton P S (1999) Biotechnol Bioeng, 65, 1-9. -   Wang X 1995 Brain Res Bull 36, 607-9. -   Weinberg A D (1992) J Immunol 148, 2109-2117. -   Weiner H L (1994) Annu. Rev. Immunol 12, 809-837. -   Wekerle H (1986) Trends Neurosci 9, 271-277. -   Wiendl H (2000) Nervenarzt 71, 597-610. -   Winer S (2001) J Immunol 166, 2831-2841. -   Winer S (2001) J Immunol 166, 4751-4756. -   Wodak S J (1987) Ann NY Acad Sci. 501, 1-13. -   Wolinsky J S (2000) Neurology, 54, 1734-41. -   Woodroofe M N (1993) Cytokine 5, 583-588. -   Wyss-Coray T (1997). J Neuroimmunol, 77, 45-50. -   Wyss-Coray T (1995) Am J Pathol, 147, 53-67. -   Wyss-Coray T (2000). Am J Pathol, 156, 139-150. -   Xu L Y (2000) Clin Immunol 95, 70-78. -   Yam ashita K 1999 Brain Res 836, 139-45. -   Yang D (2002) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 9942-9947. -   Zhang Y (1996) Nature 383:168-172. -   Zhang Y (1997) Curr Biol. 7, 270-276. -   Zhu H (1999) J Biol Chem 274, 32258-32264. -   Zhu Y 2000 Brain Res 866, 286-98. -   Zhu Y (2002) J Neurosci 22, 3898-3909. -   Zamvil S S (1990) Annu. Rev. Immunol 8, 579-621. -   Ziyadeh F N (2000) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 8015-8020. 

1. A method for preventing, ameliorating and/or treating a disease of the central nervous system and/or a disease related to and/or caused by said disease in a subject comprising administering a specific inhibitor of Smad7 expression or function to said subject in a therapeutically effective amount for the prevention, amelioration and/or treatment of a disease of the central nervous system and/or a disease related and/or caused by said disease of the central nervous system.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said specific inhibitor is selected from the group consisting of small binding molecules, intracellular-binding-partners or receptors, aptamers, intramers, RNAi (double stranded RNA) and anti-Smad7 antisense molecules.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein said intracellular binding partner or receptor is an intracellular antibody or an antibody fragment.
 4. The method of claim 2, wherein said anti-Smad7 antisense molecule comprises a nucleic acid molecule which is the complementary strand of a reversed complementary strand of the coding region of Smad7.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein Smad7 is Smad7 of mouse, rat, or human.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein said mouse Smad7 is selected from the group consisting of Smad7 encoded by a nucleotide sequence as shown in GenBank Accession number NM_(—)008543, AJ 00441 and AJ000550.
 7. The method of claim 5, wherein said rat Smad7 is selected from the group consisting of encoded by a nucleotide sequence as shown in GenBank Accession number NM_(—)030858, AH008243, AF156730, AF156729, AF156728, AF156727, AF156726 and AF042499.
 8. The method of claim 5, wherein said human Smad7 is selected from the group consisting of Smad7 encoded by a nucleotide sequence as shown in GenBank Accession number XM_(—)033746, XM_(—)008803, AF015261 and AF010193.
 9. The method of claim 4, wherein said coding region of Smad7 is selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 1, SEQ ID NO: 3 and SEQ ID NO:
 5. 10. The method of claim 4, wherein said anti-Smad7 antisense molecule is selected from the group consisting of the nucleic acid molecule cttcggctgccccacccg, (SEQ ID NO: 7) atcgtttggtcctgaacat, (SEQ ID NO: 8) ccctcctcctcgtcctcg, (SEQ ID NO: 9) gtcgccccttctccccgcag, (SEQ ID NO. 10) gccgtccgtcgccccttc, (SEQ ID NO: 11) agcaccgagtgcgtgagc, (SEQ ID NO: 12) agttcacagagtcgacta, (SEQ ID NO: 13) ggcaaaagccattcccct, (SEQ ID NO: 14) gccgatcttgctccgcac, (SEQ ID NO: 15) ctccggctgccccacccc, (SEQ ID NO: 16) cgaacatgacctccgcac, (SEQ ID NO: 17) atcgtttggtcctgaacat, (SEQ ID NO: 18) ccctcctcctcgtcctcg, (SEQ ID NO: 19) gtcgccccttctccccgcag, (SEQ ID NO: 20) gctgtccgtcgccccttc, (SEQ ID NO: 21) agcaccgagtgcgtgagc, (SEQ ID NO: 22) agttcgcagagtcggcta, (SEQ ID NO: 23) ggcaaaagccattcccct, (SEQ ID NO: 24) gccgattttgctccgcac, (SEQ ID NO: 25) ctgccccttcttccaaaa, (SEQ ID NO: 26) actcacacacactcctga, (SEQ ID NO: 27) tgcccaggtactgcctct, (SEQ ID NO: 28) gagatccaggagcagatg, (SEQ ID NO: 29) cttcggctgccccacccg, (SEQ ID NO: 30) atcgtttggtcctgaacat, (SEQ ID NO: 31) ccctcctcctcgtcctcg, (SEQ ID NO: 32) gtcgccccttctccccgcag, (SEQ ID NO: 33) gccgtccgtcgccccttc, (SEQ ID NO: 34) agcaccgagtgcgtgagc, (SEQ ID NO: 35) agttcacagagtcgacta, (SEQ ID NO: 36) ggcaaaagccattcccct, (SEQ ID NO: 37) gccgatcttgctcctcac, (SEQ ID NO: 38) and gtcgccccttctcccccgcag. (SEQ ID NO: 39)


11. The method of claim 2, wherein said RNAi is a siRNA.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein said siRNA is selected from the group consisting of RNAi1: nt 3-23 5′-GUUCAGGACCAAACGAUCUGC-3′, (SEQ ID NO:44) nt 23-1 5′-GCAGAUCGUUUGGUCCUGAACAU-3′. (SEQ ID NO:45) RNAi2: nt 283-303 5′-CUCACGCACUCGGUGCUCAAG-3′, (SEQ ID NO:46) nt 303-281 5′-CUUGAGCACCGAGUGCGUGAGCG-3′ (SEQ ID NO:47) RNAi3: nt 209-227 5′-CUCGGCGCCCGACUUCUUCuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:48) nt 227-207 5′-GAAGAAGUCGGGCGCCGAGUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:49) RNAi4: nt 266-284 5′-ACGACUUUUCUCCUCGCCUuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:50) nt 284-264 5′-AGGCGAGGAGAAAAGUCGUUU-3′; (SEQ ID NO:51) RNAi5: nt 310-328 5′-ACGAUCUGCGCUCGUCCGGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:52) nt 328-308 5′-CCGGACGAGCGCAGAUCGUUU-3′; (SEQ ID NO:53) RNAi6: nt 574-592 5′-GGCGCUCACGCACUCGGUGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:54) nt 592-572 5′-CACCGAGUGCGUGAGCGCCUU-3′; (SEQ ID NO:55) RNAi7: nt 607-625 5′-GGAGCGGCAGCUGGAGCUGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:56) nt 625-605 5′-CAGCUCCAGCUGCCGCUCCUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:57) RNAi8: ni 778-796 5′-AGUGUUCAGGUGGCCGGAUuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:58) nt 796-776 5′-AUCCGGCCACCUGAACACUuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:59) RNAi9: nt 815-833 5′-GUCAAGAGGCUGUGUUGCUuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:60) nt 833-813 5′-AGCAACACAGCCUCUUGACUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:61) RNAi10: nt 820-838 5′-GAGGCUGUGUUGCUGUGAAuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:62) nt 838-818 5′-UUCACAGACACACAGCCUCUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:63) RNAi11: nt 839-857 5′-UCUUACGGGAAGAUCAACCuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:64) nt 857-837 5′-GGUUGAUCUUCCCGUAAGAUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:65) RNAi12: nt 850-868 5′-GAUCAACCCCGAGCUGGUGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:66) nt 868-848 5′-CACCAGCUCGGGGUUGAUCUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:67) RNAi13: nt 856-874 5′-CCCCGAGCUGGUGUGCUGCuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:68) nt 874-854 5′-GCAGCACACCAGCUCGGGGUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:69) RNAi14: nt 1008-1026 5′-CGAAUUAUCUGGCCCCUGGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:70) nt 1026-1006 5′-CCAGGGGCCAGAUAAUUCGUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:71) RNAi15: nt 1046-1064 5′-CUUCUUCUGGAGCCUGGGGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:72) nt 1064-1044 5′-CCCCAGGCUCCAGAAGAAGUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:73) RNAi16: nt 1177-1195 5′-UGGCUUUUGCCUCGGACAGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:74) nt 1195-1175 5′-CUGUCCGAGGCAAAAGCCAUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:75) RNAi17: nt 1201-1219 5′-UUCGGACAACAAGAGUCAGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:76) nt 1219-1199 5′-CUGACUCUUGUUGUCCGAAUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:77) RNAi18: nt 1297-1315 5′-CCGCAGCAGUUACCCCAUCuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:78) nt 1315-1295 5′-GAUGGGGUAACUGCUGCGGUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:79) RNAi19: nt 1324-1342 5′-GUCCGCCACACUGGACAACuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:80) nt 1342-1322 5′-GUUGUCCAGUGUGGCGGACUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:81) RNAi20: nt 1342-1360 5′-CCCGGACUCCAGGACGCUGuu-3′, (SEQ ID NO:82) and nt 1360-1340 5′-CAGCGUCCUGGAGUCCGGGUU-3′, (SEQ ID NO:83)


13. The method of claim 1, wherein said subject is a mammal.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein said mammal is a human.
 15. The method of claim 1, wherein said disease of the central nervous system and/or diseases related and/or caused by said disease of the central nervous system is an autoimmune disease of the CNS, trauma or is cerebral ischemic stroke.
 16. The method of claim 15, wherein said autoimmune disease of the central nervous system is multiple sclerosis, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, primary chronic progressive multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica (Devic's syndrome) or fulminant multiple sclerosis (Marburg's variant).
 17. The method of claim 15, wherein said trauma is traumatic brain injury (TBI) or traumatic spinal cord injury.
 18. The method of claim 15, wherein said cerebral ischemic stroke is focal cerebral ischemia, global cerebral ischemia or hypoxic ischemic brain damage.
 19. The method of claim 1, wherein said disease related to and/or caused by said disease of the central nervous system is selected from the group consisting of diabetes (type 1), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, isolated autoimmune optic neuritis, isolated autoimmune transverse myelitis and Balo's concentric sclerosis.
 20. The method of claim 1, wherein said disease of the central nervous system is a neurodegenerative disorder.
 21. The method of claim 20, wherein said neurodegenerative disorder is Alzheimer's disease or Parkinson's disease. 